IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-26255-7_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Economies of Specialization and Trade

In: Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Siang Ng

Abstract

The idea that trade fosters growth dates back to Adam Smith. The central role of specialization and division of labour, and their implications for productivity growth was emphasized by Adam Smith (1776). He analysed the gains from specialization through division of labour even if all individuals are ex ante identical. The resulting concept is now referred to as ‘endogenous comparative advantage’. Emphasizing exogenous comparative advantage, David Ricardo (1817) pursued an alternative line of studies of specialization and division of labour. The neoclassical trade theory based on Ricardo’s concept of exogenous comparative advantage explains patterns of specialization and division of labour between countries. It focuses on the models with constant Retums to scale which cannot explain international trade from individuals’ decisions of their level and patterns of specialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Siang Ng, 1998. "Economies of Specialization and Trade," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Kenneth J. Arrow & Yew-Kwang Ng & Xiaokai Yang (ed.), Increasing Returns and Economic Analysis, chapter 5, pages 127-144, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-26255-7_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-26255-7_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Wenli & Yang, Xiaokai, 2004. "Inframarginal analysis of division of labor: A survey," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 137-174, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-26255-7_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.