IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-13389-5_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

From Individual Biases to Organizational Errors

In: Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Lovallo

Abstract

In economics the use of psychological assumptions other than rationality to make predictions about organizational or system behaviour is rare, although the company is quite good (Keynes, 1936; Nelson and Winter, 1982; Simon, 1982; Williamson, 1975, 1985). From an empiricist’s view-point the dearth of research using alternative psychological assumptions is disappointing since there is massive evidence that individuals deviate from rationality. Furthermore, these deviations are systematic — the errors tend to be in the same direction — which implies that non-rational behaviour is often not random but predictable. However, to be fair, incorporating assumptions other than rationality has its costs. Rational models tend to be mathematically elegant and yield precise predictions, while behavioural models tend to be more complicated and yield vague predictions. Richard Thaler (1992, p. 198) sums up the tradeoff succinctly: ‘Would you rather be elegant and precisely wrong, or messy and vaguely right?’

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Lovallo, 1996. "From Individual Biases to Organizational Errors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Giovanni Dosi & Franco Malerba (ed.), Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise, chapter 4, pages 103-123, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-13389-5_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-13389-5_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina Fang, 2012. "Organizational Learning as Credit Assignment: A Model and Two Experiments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1717-1732, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-13389-5_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.