IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/etbchp/978-1-137-04530-0_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

United States of America: GAI Almost in the 1970s but Downhill Thereafter

In: Basic Income Guarantee and Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Richard K. Caputo

Abstract

The United States’s experiences with guaranteed annual income (GAI) schemes suggest that linking them to resolving specified social problems increases the political acceptance of the idea, although it by no means ensures adoption and implementation. Alternatives more aligned with existing programs and policies of social welfare provisioning tend to be taken more seriously by the public at large and policymakers in particular. This chapter, which in part synthesizes related material from a much broader work of mine that examines social welfare policy transitions in the United States from the 1980s through the first years of the Obama administration (Caputo 2011), discusses how a GAI proposal was seriously considered and nearly adopted by the US Congress when deliberating about how to best reform its major welfare program designed primarily for low-income families, especially single-mother families with young children. It highlights the centrality of reciprocity and priority given to labor force attachment as contributing to the loss of popular support for the idea of an unconditional basic income guarantee and shows how alternative policies such as the Earned Income Tax Credit were adopted that fit more readily into a cluster of values and an existing array of social welfare provisioning associated with individual responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard K. Caputo, 2012. "United States of America: GAI Almost in the 1970s but Downhill Thereafter," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: Richard K. Caputo (ed.), Basic Income Guarantee and Politics, chapter 0, pages 265-281, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:etbchp:978-1-137-04530-0_15
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137045300_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richardson Steven O., 2013. "Entitlement Reform: From Tangled Web to Safety Net," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 105-137, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:etbchp:978-1-137-04530-0_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.