Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, what lessons can be drawn?
There is disagreement about whether large and complex financial institutions should be allowed to use US bankruptcy law to reorganise when they get into financial difficulty. We look at the events surrounding the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy filing for lessons as to whether bankruptcy law could be used to produce an orderly windup of the affairs of a failed financial firm. If so, then judicial resolution under the US Bankruptcy Code might be a better alternative to bailouts or to resolution under the Dodd–Frank Act's orderly liquidation authority. We find that there is no clear evidence that bankruptcy law is insufficient to handle the resolution of large complex financial firms.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
|This chapter was published in: Steven N. Durlauf & Lawrence E. Blume (ed.) , , chapter 1, pages , 2012,3rd quarter update.|
|This item is provided by Palgrave Macmillan in its series The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics with number v:6:year:2012:doi:3882.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/|
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/help/faq#_Toc198623697 Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:dofeco:v:6:year:2012:doi:3882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sheeja Sanoj)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.