IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/2281.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Survey of the Theory of Public Expenditure Criteria

In: Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Otto Eckstein

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Otto Eckstein, 1961. "A Survey of the Theory of Public Expenditure Criteria," NBER Chapters, in: Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, pages 439-504, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:2281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2281.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmid, A. Allan, 2004. "Economic Analysis And Efficiency In Public Expenditure," Staff Paper Series 11776, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    2. Erhun KULA, 2006. "The social discount rate in cost benefit analysis: the British experience and lessons to be learned," Departmental Working Papers 2006-19, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    3. Beatrice Cherrier & Jean-Baptiste Fleury, 2017. "Economists’ interest in collective decision after World War II: a history," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 23-44, July.
    4. Aidan R. Vining & David L. Weimer, 2013. "An assessment of important issues concerning the application of benefit–cost analysis to social policy," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 1, pages 25-62, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Revesz, Richard & Stavins, Robert, 2004. "Environmental Law and Policy," Working Paper Series rwp04-023, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    6. Howe, J., 1981. "Criteria for rural road planning," ILO Working Papers 992154743402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Michael Spackman, 2011. "Government discounting controversies: the valuation of social time preference," GRI Working Papers 68, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    8. Guadalupe Souto Nieves, 2003. "El descuento social," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 165(2), pages 99-126, June.
    9. Hemmer, H.-R., 1974. "Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Projektbewertung in Entwicklungsländern," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 11.
    10. Walter Hettich, 1976. "Distribution in Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Review of Theoretical Issues," Public Finance Review, , vol. 4(2), pages 123-150, April.
    11. Eli P. Fenichel & Matthew J. Kotchen & Ethan T. Addicott, 2017. "Even the Representative Agent Must Die: Using Demographics to Inform Long-Term Social Discount Rates," NBER Working Papers 23591, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. E Kula, 1985. "An Empirical Investigation on the Social Time-Preference Rate for the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(2), pages 199-212, February.
    13. Monika Foltyn-Zarychta & Rafał Buła & Krystian Pera, 2021. "Discounting for Energy Transition Policies—Estimation of the Social Discount Rate for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Robert Inman, 1981. "On setting the agenda for Pennsylvania school finance reform: An exercise in giving policy advice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 449-474, January.
    15. Lopez, Humberto, 2008. "The social discount rate : estimates for nine Latin American countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4639, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:2281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.