IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/lum/prchap/03-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Rhetoric of Alterity in the Contemporary French Political Discourse

In: New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Eleonora MIHAILA

    (Free International University of Moldova, Chisinau, the Republic of Moldova)

Abstract

The political argumentation, born in reaction to the difference of opinions (ex superficie) and interests (ex profundis) in the fields of politics, is of dialogical nature by its essence. The alterity is a discoursive product, as it is constructed and deconstructed by means of the language. Which are the ways of discoursive representation of The Other – the political opponent, along with its system of ideas, values, objectives, strategies – throughout the act of argumentation in the political discourse? Given the dialogical nature of the argumentation, the alterity finds its expression depending on the pragmatic roles it assumes in the process of argumentation, such as: subject, object, recipient. In order to understand the ways of discoursive expression of the alterity, we hereby propose an inter-disciplinary research – positioned at the crossroads of the theory of argumentation and semiotics with elements of anthropological study. The empirical part consists in the application of a bi-model treatment pattern so as to identify and analyse the discoursive forms of alterity in two speeches delivered by Emmanuel Macron and Marine le Pen during the French presidential election campaign 2017. Understanding the discoursive essence of the alterity and of the ways of expression of such conceptual disjunction stands as a guarantor for the understanding of the roots of the political dissent and the canalization of such dissent towards a constructive path in a climate of clarity, transparency, tolerance and willingness to identify solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleonora MIHAILA, 2018. "The Rhetoric of Alterity in the Contemporary French Political Discourse," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Veaceslav MANOLACHI & Cristian Mihail RUS & Svetlana RUSNAC (ed.), New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 25, pages 294-302, Editura Lumen.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:03-25
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.nashs2017.25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/378/378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.nashs2017.25?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boicu, Ruxandra, 2007. "Pragmatic identity and alterity in political discourse," MPRA Paper 45838, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Mar 2007.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Political discourse; argumentation; alterity; opponent; difference;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • A3 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works
      • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
      • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
      • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:03-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.