IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/ibg/chaptr/conissue-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Corporate Reorganization in Republic of Serbia - Lessons from EU Praxis

In: Contemporary Issues in the Integration Processes of Western Balkan Countries in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Djuro Djuric

    (Institute of Economic Sciences)

  • Drasko Nikolic

    (Institute of Economic Sciences)

Abstract

New Law on business companies in Republic of Serbia adopted in 2011 gives a opportunity to analyze certain regulations important for business activity of commercial entities. One of such regulations is on reorganization of company or corporation. Although the new law has brought changes in regulation of companies, it did not make important modifications in issues of corporate reorganization. Legislator in Republic of Serbia adjusted legal regulations on companies with the EU legislation in its previous reform in 2004. All EU directives regarding issue of business activity already adopted by the EU Council were adopted in Serbian company law. Corporate reorganization is of great importance for survival and functioning of one company. It shows clearly how its participant’s interests may be different – majority interest, management interest, minority interest, interest of its creditors, interest of state etc. In this paper are analyzed the most present problems in the corporate reorganization operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Djuro Djuric & Drasko Nikolic, 2011. "Corporate Reorganization in Republic of Serbia - Lessons from EU Praxis," Book Chapters, in: Stefan Bogdan Salej & Dejan Eric & Srdjan Redzepagic & Ivan Stosic (ed.), Contemporary Issues in the Integration Processes of Western Balkan Countries in the European Union, chapter 16, pages 256-270, Institute of Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibg:chaptr:conissue-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ien.bg.ac.rs/images/stories/download/contemporaryissues_ch16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marko Simoneti & Aleksandra Gregoric, 2004. "Managerial ownership and corporate performance in Slovenian post-privatisation period," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 1(2), pages 217-241, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saul Estrin & Jan Hanousek & Evzen Kocenda & Jan Svejnar, 2009. "The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 699-728, September.
    2. Nina Cankar & Simon Deakin & Marko Simoneti, 2008. "The Reflexive Properties of Corporate Governance Codes: The Reception of the 'Comply or Explain' Approach in Slovenia," Working Papers wp371, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    3. Dejan Eric & Ivan Stosic, 2011. "Upgrading Corporate Governance Practice of State Owned Enterprises in Processes of EU Integration – Comparation of Serbia and Slovenia," Book Chapters, in: Stefan Bogdan Salej & Dejan Eric & Srdjan Redzepagic & Ivan Stosic (ed.), Contemporary Issues in the Integration Processes of Western Balkan Countries in the European Union, chapter 14, pages 213-236, Institute of Economic Sciences.
    4. Mulaj, Isa, 2006. "Redefining Property Rights with Specific Reference to Social Ownership in Successor States of Former Yugoslavia: Did it Matter for Economic Efficiency?," MPRA Paper 243, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Aleksandra Gregoric & Cristina Vespro, 2009. "Block trades and the benefits of control in Slovenia1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 17(1), pages 175-210, January.
    6. Arnault Morisson, David Bole, Jani Kozina, Maru a Golu a, Clara Turner, Heike Mayer, 2021. "Transformation in Industrial Towns in Slovenia and Switzerland," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper34, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibg:chaptr:conissue-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zorica Bozic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienbgyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.