IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/fpr/ifpric/183432.html

State of the agricultural negotiations and prospects for progress at MC14

In: Agricultural trade at a crossroads with Latin American, Caribbean, and African perspectives for post-MC14

Author

Listed:
  • Glauber, Joseph W.

Abstract

Agricultural negotiations have largely been stalemated since the collapse of the Doha Round in July 2008. Members have struggled to fulfil in its entirety the mandate set out in Article 20 of the Agreement on Agreement (AOA), as well as other relevant Ministerial mandates. With the exception of a few outcomes, including those on Public Stockholding and the administration of Tariff Rate Quotas at the Ninth Ministerial Conference (MC9) in Bali in 2013, on Export Competition at MC10 in Nairobi in 2015, and on export restrictions for food aid in MC12 in Geneva, there has not been any substantive outcome in the agriculture negotiations since they were launched in 2000. The prospects for a substantive outcome at MC14 in Yaoundé remained limited, as sharp divisions persisted among Members on several critical issues, while recent trade actions have added further strain to the multilateral trading system and risk undermining progress achieved over the past three decades. I begin by reviewing progress in the so-called pillars of the AOA: domestic support, market access, and export competition. I then consider the areas of contention during the Doha Round negotiations, specifically the special safeguard mechanism (SSM), cotton, public stockholding (PSH), and export restrictions. I conclude with a broad assessment of the chances for meaningful progress and discuss some potential avenues beyond Yaoundé.

Suggested Citation

  • Glauber, Joseph W., 2026. "State of the agricultural negotiations and prospects for progress at MC14," IFPRI book chapters, in: Agricultural trade at a crossroads with Latin American, Caribbean, and African perspectives for post-MC14, chapter 1, pages p. 16-32, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifpric:183432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/183432
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifpric:183432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.