IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/bis/bisifc/61-21.html

Connecting the dots of the international debate on the standardization and granularity of regulatory data

In: Granular data: new horizons and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Casa

Abstract

The European banking reporting 'ecosystem' for statistical, prudential and resolution purposes has become increasingly complex and costly for both authorities and financial institutions. We are confronted with a significant number of surveys nowadays, combining aggregated, item-level and transactional data. The underlying business phenomena are often overlapping and not always defined in a consistent, integrated and reconcilable manner. Against this background, this paper tries to (i) connect the dots of the intense debate that has taken place in various European and international fora over the last five years, focusing on how to rationalize the overall reporting framework, and (ii) map out a possible way forward. Two main streams of innovative initiatives, high-level reports and studies are reviewed. The first aims to define a mandatory, common granular layer of multipurpose (integrated) data, located in banks' IT systems, which would provide programmable code to reference these data in order to generate the reporting of regulatory metrics. The second stream aims to standardize banks' operational systems by generating granular contractual information in near real-time. This paper argues that, despite the attempts to demonstrate the potential benefits of these innovative approaches, their adoption to replace the existing setup still appears premature even in the medium term. While exploring new ways to benefit from 'on demand' access to timely and integrated sources of data, the authorities in Europe have already launched strategic initiatives for the rationalization, standardization and integration of the existing reporting framework. In this respect, the ESCB's IReF and the wider integration initiative at European level, following the EBA's feasibility study, are important and tangible actions to significantly reduce the reporting burden on all stakeholders in the medium term. The cooperation between the European authorities and the banking industry will be key in
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Casa, 2024. "Connecting the dots of the international debate on the standardization and granularity of regulatory data," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Granular data: new horizons and challenges, volume 61, Bank for International Settlements.
  • Handle: RePEc:bis:bisifc:61-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/ifc/publ/ifcb61_21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Poloni, Paolo, 2024. "The evolution of the supervisory reporting framework for the EU banking sector," Occasional Paper Series 363, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bisifc:61-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Fessler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.