Student’s concretion learning outcomes, satisfaction and dropout intentions
In: Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 6
Student satisfaction has become an increasingly important component of institutional reports as a means of accountability to educational stakeholders. The measures and models for this vary across higher education institutions. Some models try to understand how different perceptions of quality areas impact student satisfaction, while others use more complex relationships that integrate factors such as student learning outcomes and student persistence intentions. This research tries to disentangle the relationship between student satisfaction, involvement and learning outcomes drawing on Astin’s involvement theory (1999), Tinto’s dropout intentions model (1975) and the services marketing literature. This article presents a conceptual framework and findings of four studies testing fragments of the framework. Data sets come from three different countries (Spain, U.S. and Colombia), and various undergraduate programs (Business and Economics, Geography and Nursing). The methodological approach consists of a base questionnaire adapted to the specific contexts and undergraduate programs. The path models are empirically tested using structural equations modeling based on the Partial Least Squares algorithm. Findings suggest that student involvement can be as important as perceived service quality on explaining student’s cognitive learning outcomes, which in turn explains a high percentage of satisfaction and affective learning outcomes. The studies also shed light on the roles of variables such as burnout exhaustion and dropout intentions.
|This chapter was published in: ||This item is provided by Asociación de Economía de la Educación in its series Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 6 with number
06-27.||Handle:|| RePEc:aec:ieed06:06-27||Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.economicsofeducation.com|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aec:ieed06:06-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.