IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/psc590.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Daiane Scaraboto

Personal Details

First Name:Daiane
Middle Name:
Last Name:Scaraboto
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:psc590
http://dscaraboto.blogspot.com

Affiliation

Escuela de Administración
Facultad de Ciencia Económicas y Administrativas
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Santiago, Chile
http://www.eauc.cl/

:


RePEc:edi:eapuccl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles

Articles

  1. Ferreira, Marcia Christina & Scaraboto, Daiane, 2016. "“My plastic dreams”: Towards an extended understanding of materiality and the shaping of consumer identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 191-207.
  2. Daiane Scaraboto, 2015. "Selling, Sharing, and Everything In Between: The Hybrid Economies of Collaborative Networks," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 152-176.
  3. Daiane Scaraboto & Eileen Fischer, 2013. "Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(6), pages 1234-1257.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. Ferreira, Marcia Christina & Scaraboto, Daiane, 2016. "“My plastic dreams”: Towards an extended understanding of materiality and the shaping of consumer identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 191-207.

    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Ha Youn & Kwon, Yoo Jin, 2017. "Blurring production-consumption boundaries: Making my own luxury bag," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 120-125.

  2. Daiane Scaraboto, 2015. "Selling, Sharing, and Everything In Between: The Hybrid Economies of Collaborative Networks," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 152-176.

    Cited by:

    1. Linda L. Price & Russell W. Belk, 2016. "Consumer Ownership and Sharing: Introduction to the Issue," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 193-197.
    2. Johanna F. Gollnhofer & Katharina Hellwig & Felicitas Morhart, 2016. "Fair Is Good, but What Is Fair? Negotiations of Distributive Justice in an Emerging Nonmonetary Sharing Model," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 226-245.
    3. Dellaert, B.G.C., 2018. "The Consumer Production Journey: Marketing to Consumers as Co-Producers in the Sharing Economy," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2018-001-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Lars Böcker & Toon Meelen, 2016. "Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 16-02, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Aug 2016.
    5. Gentina, Elodie & Hogg, Margaret K. & Sakashita, Mototaka, 2017. "Identity (Re)construction through sharing: A study of mother and teenage daughter dyads in France and Japan," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 67-77.
    6. Mair, Johanna & Reischauer, Georg, 2017. "Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 11-20.
    7. Roos, Daniel & Hahn, Rüdiger, 2017. "Does shared consumption affect consumers' values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 113-123.
    8. Giana M. Eckhardt & Fleura Bardhi, 2016. "The Relationship between Access Practices and Economic Systems," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 210-225.
    9. Murillo, David & Buckland, Heloise & Val, Esther, 2017. "When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 66-76.
    10. Milanova, Veselina & Maas, Peter, 2017. "Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 159-171.
    11. Thomas Puschmann & Rainer Alt, 2016. "Sharing Economy," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 93-99, February.
    12. Bénédicte de Peyrelongue & Olivier Masclef & Valérie Guillard, 2017. "The Need to Give Gratuitously: A Relevant Concept Anchored in Catholic Social Teaching to Envision the Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(4), pages 739-755, November.

  3. Daiane Scaraboto & Eileen Fischer, 2013. "Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(6), pages 1234-1257.

    Cited by:

    1. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    2. Vittoria Marino & Letizia Lo Presti, 2015. "L’impatto della brand crisis sulla clientela e l’effetto della fedeltà alla marca," MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3), pages 103-121.
    3. Stefano Pace & Matteo Corciolani & Giacomo Gistri, 2017. "Consumers’ responses to ethical brand crises on social media platforms," MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 141-157.
    4. Ourahmoune, Nacima, 2017. "Embodied transformations and food restrictions: The case of medicalized obesity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 192-201.
    5. Johanna F. Gollnhofer & Katharina Hellwig & Felicitas Morhart, 2016. "Fair Is Good, but What Is Fair? Negotiations of Distributive Justice in an Emerging Nonmonetary Sharing Model," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 226-245.
    6. Bernard Cova & Gerald Gaglio & Juliette Weber & Philippe Chanial, 2018. "Organizational Sensemaking of Non-ethical Consumer Behavior: Case Study of a French Mutual Insurance Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 783-799, April.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Daiane Scaraboto should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.