Program Applicants as a Comparison Group in Evaluating Training Programs: Theory and a Test
The authors begin with a thorough assessment of the many nonexperimental employment and training program evaluation techniques based on non-random comparison groups. These techniques typically use econometric methods to estimate the effects of employment and training programs by using comparison groups from non-program "external" sources. Then, recognizing the inherent drawbacks in these methods, Bell, Orr, Blomquist and Cain respond by reintroducing an evaluation method first implemented in the 1960s, the use of "internal" comparison groups consisting of nonparticipating program applicants.
|This book is provided by W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in its series Books from Upjohn Press with number pacg and published in 1995.|
|Note:||PDF is the book's first chapter.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.upjohn.orgEmail:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upj:ubooks:pacg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.