IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book

Review of Regulatory Burden on the Upstream Petroleum (Oil and Gas) Sector

Listed author(s):
  • Productivity Commission
Registered author(s):

    In 2008, the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) identified the upstream petroleum (oil and gas) sector as one of many ‘hotspot’ areas where overlapping and inconsistent regulation threatens to impede economic activity, and agreed that the Productivity Commission should undertake a review of the regulatory burden within the sector. The Commission’s report, released in April 2009, recommends measures to reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens on the upstream oil and gas sector. It considers that these burdens can be removed without compromising policy objectives in areas such as resource management, the environment, heritage, development, land access and occupational health and safety. Oil and gas projects are large and complex, giving rise to unique and substantial environmental and other issues. In addition, most projects span multiple jurisdictions, adding a further layer of complexity. According to the Commission’s report, duplication, overlap and inconsistent administration of the 22 petroleum and pipeline laws and more than 150 statutes governing upstream petroleum activities, impose significant unnecessary burdens on the sector. Undue delays in the project approval process are potentially diminishing the present value of petroleum resource extraction in Australia by billions of dollars each year. There is no simple, single answer to the problem of unnecessary regulatory burden in the upstream petroleum sector. The Commission proposes a suite of changes, falling into two broad groups: implementing regulatory best practice and reforming institutional arrangements

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    in new window

    This book is provided by Productivity Commission, Government of Australia in its series Research Reports with number 33 and published in 2009.
    ISBN: 978-1-74037-278-7
    Handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:33
    Note: 414 pages.
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Level 28, 35 Collins St, Melbourne Victoria 3000

    Phone: 61 3 9653 2100
    Fax: 61 3 9653 2199
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (MAPS)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.