IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book

Inequality, Growth, and Poverty in an Era of Liberalization and Globalization

Listed editor(s):
  • Cornia, Giovanni Andrea
    (University of Florence)

Registered editor(s):

Within-country income inequality has risen since the early 1980s in most of the OECD, all transitional, and many developing countries. More recently, inequality has risen also in India and nations affected by the Asian crisis. Altogether, over the last twenty years, inequality worsened in 70 per cent of the 73 countries analysed in this volume, with the Gini index rising by over five points in half of them. In several cases, the Gini index follows a U-shaped pattern, with the turn-around point located between the late 1970s and early 1990s. Where the shift towards liberalization and globalization was concluded, the right arm of the U stabilized at the 'steady state level of inequality' typical of the new policy regime, as observed in the UK after 1990. Mainstream theory focusing on rises in wage differentials by skill caused by either North-South trade, migration, or technological change poorly explains the recent rise in income inequality. Likewise, while the traditional causes of income polarization-high land concentration, unequal access to education, the urban bias, the 'curse of natural resources'-still account for much of cross-country variation in income inequality, they cannot explain its recent rise. This volume suggests that the recent rise in income inequality was caused to a considerable extent by a policy-driven worsening in factorial income distribution, wage spread and spatial inequality. In this regard, the volume discusses the distributive impact of reforms in trade and financial liberalization, taxation, public expenditure, safety nets, and labour markets. The volume thus represents one of the first attempts to analyse systematically the relation between policy changes inspired by liberalization and globalization and income inequality. It suggests that capital account liberalization appears to have had-on average-the strongest disequalizing effect, followed by domestic financial liberalization, labour market deregulation, and tax reform. Trade liberalization had unclear effects, while public expenditure reform often had positive effects. Available in OSO: Contributors to this volume - Prof. Tony Addison Deputy Director World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) Prof. Anthony B. Atkinson Warden, Nuffield College, Oxford University Prof. Michael Carter BASIS Director Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison Prof. Daniele Checchi Facolta di Scienze Statistiche Universita degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Dr. Ke-young Chu Dept. of Economics Wesleyan University Prof. Giovanni Andrea Cornia Department of Economics University of Florence Dr. Hamid Davoodi International Monetary Fund Dr. Rahul Dhumale Senior Economist Federal Reserve Bank USA Prof. Robert Eastwood School of Social Sciences University of Sussex Dr. Sanjeev Gupta Chief of Expenditure Policy Division, Fiscal Affairs Department IMF Prof. Isra Sarntisart Faculty of Economics Chulalongkorn University Thailand Dr. Carolyn Jenkins Research Associate Centre for the Study of African Economies University of Oxford Prof. Raghbendra Jha Executive Director, Australia South Asia Research Centre Australian National University Dr. Sampsa Kiiski Helsinki, Finland Prof. Michael Lipton Poverty Research Unit University of Sussex UK Dr. Sanjay G. Reddy Dept. of Economics Barnard College Columbia University Prof. Francisco Rodriguez C. Chief Economist, Venezuelan National Assembly Dr. Catherine Saget Employment Sector International Labour Organisation Prof. Ajit Singh Senior Fellow, Queens' College Cambridge University Prof. Lance Taylor Arnhold Professor of International and Cooperation and Development New School University New York Dr. Lynne Thomas Centre for Research into Economics and Finance in Southern Africa London School of Economics Prof. Rolph van der Hoeven Employment Sector International Labour Organisation Prof. A. Erinc Yeldan Department of Economics Bilkent University Turkey

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

in new window

This book is provided by Oxford University Press in its series OUP Catalogue with number 9780199271412 and published in 2004.
ISBN: 9780199271412
Handle: RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780199271412
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780199271412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Economics Book Marketing)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.