IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780195170184.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Failed: What the "Experts" Got Wrong about the Global Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Weisbrot, Mark

    (Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, D.C.)

Abstract

Why has the Eurozone ended up with an unemployment rate more than twice that of the United States more than six years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers? Why did the vast majority of low- and middle-income countries suffer a prolonged economic slowdown in the last two decades of the 20th century? What was the role of the International Monetary Fund in these economic failures? Why was Latin America able to achieve substantial poverty reduction in the 21st century after more than two decades without any progress? Failed analyzes these questions, explaining why these important economic developments of recent years have been widely misunderstood and in some cases almost completely ignored. First, in the Eurozone, Mark Weisbrot argues that the European authorities' political agenda, which included shrinking the welfare state, reducing health care, pension, and other social spending, and reducing the bargaining power of labor played a very important role in prolonging the Eurozone's financial crisis and pushing it into years of recession and mass unemployment. This conclusion is based not only on public statements of European officials, but also on thousands of pages of documentation from consultations between the IMF and European governments after 2008. The second central theme of Failed is that there are always practical alternatives to prolonged economic failure. Drawing on the history of other financial crises, recessions, and recoveries, Weisbrot argues that regardless of initial conditions, there have been and remain economically feasible choices for governments of the Eurozone to greatly reduce unemployment-including the hardest hit, crisis-ridden country of Greece. The long-term economic failure of developing countries, its social consequences, as well as the subsequent recovery in the first decade of the 21st century, constitute the third part of the book's narrative, one that has previously gotten too little attention. We see why the International Monetary Fund has lost influence in middle income countries. Failed also examines the economic causes and consequences of Latin America's "second independence" and rebound in the twenty-first century, as well as the challenges that lie ahead. Available in OSO:

Suggested Citation

  • Weisbrot, Mark, 2015. "Failed: What the "Experts" Got Wrong about the Global Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195170184.
  • Handle: RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780195170184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronn Pineo, 2016. "Progress in Bolivia: Declining the United States Influence and the Victories of Evo Morales," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 421-453, December.
    2. N/A, 2018. "Books Received (Current as of Spring 2018)," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 222-224, March.
    3. N/A, 2016. "Books Received (Current as of Winter 2017)," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(4), pages 685-687, December.
    4. N/A, 2017. "Books Received (Current as of Summer 2017)," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 501-503, September.
    5. Leonard Lynn & Hal Salzman, 2023. "Techno‐nationalism or building a global science and technology commons? (but what about China?)," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 832-846, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780195170184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economics Book Marketing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.oup.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.