IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/iie/ppress/3634.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Case Studies in US Trade Negotiation: Resolving Disputes, Vol. 2

Author

Listed:
  • Charan Devereaux
  • Robert Z. Lawrence

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Michael D. Watkins

Abstract

Between 1992 and 2000, US exports rose by 55 percent. By the year 2000, trade summed to 26 percent of US GDP, and the United States imported almost two-thirds of its oil and was the world's largest host country for foreign investors. America's interest in a more open and prosperous foreign market is now squarely economic. These case studies in multilateral trade policymaking and dispute settlement explore the changing substance of trade agreements and also delve into the negotiation process--the who, how, and why of decision making. These books present a coherent description of the facts that will allow for discussion and independent conclusions about policies, politics, and processes. Volume 2 presents five cases on trade negotiations that have had important effects on trade policy rulemaking, as well as an analytic framework for evaluating these negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Charan Devereaux & Robert Z. Lawrence & Michael D. Watkins, 2006. "Case Studies in US Trade Negotiation: Resolving Disputes, Vol. 2," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 3634, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:iie:ppress:3634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/bookstore/case-studies-us-trade-negotiation-resolving-disputes
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Lake & Ding Liu, 2022. "Local Labor Market Effects of the 2002 Bush Steel Tariffs," CESifo Working Paper Series 9909, CESifo.
    2. Volman, Lucas, 2018. "The TRIPS Article 31 Tug of War Developing Country Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patents and Developed Country Retaliation," LawArXiv 6cxaj, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:ppress:3634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.