Author
Listed:
- Willis, Reilly Anne Dempsey
- Clayden, Adam
- Polley, Laura
Abstract
In June 2020, stories of abuse related to the streaming site Twitch flooded Twitter (now X). Hundreds of individuals turned to social media to share their experiences. We explored these allegations to better understand why individuals turned to social-media based informal systems of justice rather than traditional civil or criminal systems of justice. Our findings were situated within the context of community-based policing of social media. We used a semi mixed methods approach, quantifying 150 allegations with descriptive statistics, qualitatively exploring motivations and desired outcomes, and identifying trends and relationships. This study is unique in its approach to studying both on- and off-line relationships, and in focussing on the role of individual notions of justice in regulating the streaming environment. This study found that, perhaps contrary to initial assumptions, social media, community-based informal systems of justice were quite similar to traditional formal systems of justice. Individuals sought similar outcomes centred around consequentialism, deterrence, and protection of society, while organic elements of due process emerged. Our study ultimately contributes to our understanding of the conflicting power dynamics in the streaming industry, challenges some of the gender stereotypes attached to this industry, and adds a new dimension to the critiques of the use of community-based policing and informal systems of justice, where we see that justice, in some instances, can indeed be achieved.
Suggested Citation
Willis, Reilly Anne Dempsey & Clayden, Adam & Polley, Laura, 2026.
"Community-based policing and emerging informal systems of justice: Battling against the dark side of Twitch,"
Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26.
Handle:
RePEc:zbw:iprjir:343600
DOI: 10.14763/2026.2.2100
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:343600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.