IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/343597.html

Scroll. Like. Divide. The filter bubble effect on electoral perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Opariuc-Dan, Cristian
  • Tasenţe, Tănase
  • Popescu, Cristina-Dana

Abstract

This study presents a validated psychometric instrument for assessing filter bubble effects and underscores the need for targeted, system-level interventions that extend beyond individual user-focused solutions. By situating filter bubbles within electoral dynamics, this study contributes to a more nuanced and policy-relevant understanding of how social media platforms shape democratic discourse. This study examines the impact of algorithmic personalisation on electoral perceptions through the lens of the filter bubble phenomenon. Drawing on a multidimensional instrument, the Bubblemetrix Index, we assess four core components: algorithmic curation awareness, perceived source diversity, ideological homogeneity and confirmation bias, and repeated interaction and engagement. Data were collected through an online survey of 451 Romanian Facebook users during the pre-electoral period and analysed using latent profile and latent class modelling. The findings identify three distinct user profiles, with the largest group consisting of younger individuals who demonstrate high algorithmic awareness but also exhibit strong confirmation bias and repeated engagement, which suggest that awareness alone is insufficient to counteract ideological encapsulation. Older users, by contrast, exhibited lower susceptibility to ideological homogeneity and engagement-driven reinforcement. The results challenge the assumption that media literacy and perceived diversity constitute adequate safeguards against polarisation and suggest that algorithmic systems may create an illusion of diversity while structurally amplifying partisan exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Opariuc-Dan, Cristian & Tasenţe, Tănase & Popescu, Cristina-Dana, 2026. "Scroll. Like. Divide. The filter bubble effect on electoral perceptions," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 15(2), pages 1-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:343597
    DOI: 10.14763/2026.2.2090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/343597/1/1983768243.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2026.2.2090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:343597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.