IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/337510.html

Clash between law power and code power: The case of Norway vs. Meta

Author

Listed:
  • Spilker, Hendrik Storstein
  • Reppen, Maria

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the controversies leading up to and following Meta's introduction of the infamous "pay or okay model" for Facebook and Instagram users in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) region. In particular, we focus on the central role of the Norwegian data protection and consumer authorities and the unfolding of the events in the time period from the summer of 2023 to the spring of 2024. With a theoretical departure point in critical platform studies, we perform a framing analysis of the arguments employed by the central actors in the controversy in this period, which, in addition to the Norwegian authorities and Meta, include the European consumer umbrella BEUC. Furthermore, in the discussion section of the article, we address the dynamics between the various forms of power at actors' disposal to understand the anatomy of the clash between code and market power on one hand and regulatory power on the other, or, in other words, between US Big Tech and European law and policy. Thus, the article is a contribution to knowledge about how powerful platform companies employ their code and market power in phases of discussing regulation of their businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Spilker, Hendrik Storstein & Reppen, Maria, 2026. "Clash between law power and code power: The case of Norway vs. Meta," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:337510
    DOI: 10.14763/2026.1.2078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/337510/1/1963011589.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2026.1.2078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:337510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.