IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/336203.html

Science-on-chain: How can we trust science again?

Author

Listed:
  • Heurich, Benjamin
  • Lukács, Bence
  • Weidener, Lukas

Abstract

Over the last few decades society has lost significant trust in the work of the scientific community and debated the trustworthiness of scientific findings and (policy) implications. In response, an open science framework has been proposed based on accessibility and transparency of data and increased collaboration and participation among the scientific community and society at large. We argue that this can restore trust within society, and science itself. Following the proposed framework innovative scientists discovered the affordances of blockchain technology (e.g. inherent transparency, immutability, data security). However, since this issue describes a fundamental trend in society as a whole, it is worthwhile to conduct a sociological analysis through Niklas Luhmann's Systems Theory that focuses on both the functional areas and the purpose of trust in modern societies and the overall approach to disruptive technologies. This paper focuses on two key texts, the Bitcoin and Bloxberg white papers, used here as case studies to examine the theoretical underpinnings of trust in blockchain-based systems. We argue that while blockchain offers potential solutions, the term 'trust' is often misused in these discourses, overshadowing the need for a robust sociological framework. By critically analysing these technologies, we highlight their potential to reshape scientific practices and restore trust through a decentralised, transparent infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Heurich, Benjamin & Lukács, Bence & Weidener, Lukas, 2026. "Science-on-chain: How can we trust science again?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:336203
    DOI: 10.14763/2026.1.2070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/336203/1/1951213246.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2026.1.2070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:336203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.