IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/336198.html

Platform badges for civic communication: An interdisciplinary discussion of a risk mitigation measure pursuant to Art. 35 DSA

Author

Listed:
  • Rau, Jan
  • Harfst, Jan-Ole
  • Mast, Tobias

Abstract

To promote civility in public discourse on online platforms while respecting user freedoms, this paper explores a voluntary user badge system. By asking users to commit to civic norms of discourse, this system rewards their commitment with increased visibility, offering a potentially effective but underutilised approach to fostering constructive engagement. We examine different design options for these badges from an interdisciplinary perspective, assessing their potential benefits and risks in terms of discourse quality and users' fundamental rights, particularly within the context of the attention economy and the challenges posed by disinformation as well as conflict-driven and emotionally negatively charged content. The badge system aims to introduce a new logic of attention distribution to digital platforms, strengthening the structural conditions for civic communication. Through this analysis, we aim to contribute to platform governance from the perspectives of both political communication studies and legal studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rau, Jan & Harfst, Jan-Ole & Mast, Tobias, 2025. "Platform badges for civic communication: An interdisciplinary discussion of a risk mitigation measure pursuant to Art. 35 DSA," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:336198
    DOI: 10.14763/2025.4.2054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/336198/1/1946514632.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2025.4.2054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:336198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.