Author
Listed:
- Annabell, Taylor
- Bishop, Sophie
- Goan, Catalina
Abstract
Social media platforms are significant actors within the creator economy, shaping the visibility vital for content distribution and facilitating a range of monetisation models. Private governance, established through platform documentation, determines rules for influencers and regulates how monetisation takes place. This article brings together work from influencer studies with the field of platform governance to examine the regulation by platforms in the creator economy. Using TikTok as a case study, we systematically examine the classification of influencers and monetisation practices within platform documentation. Drawing on a data set of 85 policy documents, the article demonstrates the complex configuration of documentation influencers must navigate, drawing attention to hyperlinking practices and issues of accessibility. It approaches the documentation qualitatively to examine the discursive construction of influencers as creators' which collapses boundaries between ordinary and monetising users, softens the hierarchy of eligibility shaped by region and metrics, and downplays professional identity. We also address the specificities of governance across different monetisation practices, which are nested within TikTok's consistent downplaying of responsibility. Within its documentation, TikTok showcases its power to establish and set rules for monetisation and engender dependence whilst ensuring its obligations towards influencers remain tightly constrained and strategically vague.
Suggested Citation
Annabell, Taylor & Bishop, Sophie & Goan, Catalina, 2025.
"You and TikTok are, and will remain at all times, independent contractors,"
Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 14(3), pages 1-52.
Handle:
RePEc:zbw:iprjir:333331
DOI: 10.14763/2025.3.2014
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:333331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.