IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/315588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour pains: Content moderation challenges in Mastodon growth

Author

Listed:
  • Spencer-Smith, Charlotte

Abstract

After Elon Musk took over Twitter in October 2022, the number of users on the alternative social media platform Mastodon rose dramatically. The sudden influx of new users posed several challenges to content moderation distinct from those in large commercial social media. This article investigates the challenges Mastodon communities have faced and how their admins and content moderators have managed them. Based on scholarly literature, the article contextualises Mastodon as an open source, federated alternative to corporate social media and explains how content moderation is expected to occur in this model, including possible challenges from sudden growth in user numbers. The article then empirically investigates challenges experienced by Mastodon instances post-Musk, based on eight interviews with admins and moderators of seven instances and a representative of Independent Federated Trust & Safety (IFTAS), a non-profit organisation that supports Mastodon content moderators. The research finds that challenges and the responses to them vary depending on the characteristics of the instance, such as size, thematic focus and geography, andinstances tend to adopt measures tailored to their communities. However, a tension between centralisation and decentralisation, including Global North-South differences, cuts across the network, which may be accentuated by further growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Spencer-Smith, Charlotte, 2025. "Labour pains: Content moderation challenges in Mastodon growth," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:315588
    DOI: 10.14763/2025.1.1831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/315588/1/1923076043.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2025.1.1831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bodó, Balázs & Brekke, Jaya Klara & Hoepman, Jaap-Henk, 2021. "Decentralisation: A multidisciplinary perspective," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacobs, Mattis & Kurtz, Christian & Simon, Judith & Böhmann, Tilo, 2021. "Value Sensitive Design and power in socio-technical ecosystems," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26.
    2. Igor Calzada, 2024. "Decentralized Web3 Reshaping Internet Governance: Towards the Emergence of New Forms of Nation-Statehood?," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.
    3. Pascal Frank & Markus Rudolf, 2024. "Is the Metaverse Dead? Insights from Financial Bubble Analysis," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Villar-Onrubia, Daniel & Marín, Victoria I., 2022. "Independently-hosted web publishing," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11.
    5. Chen Ping‐Kuo & Ye Yong, 2024. "Realizing environmental sustainability development through the efficiency of Web 3.0 on supply chain resilience," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1243-1260, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:315588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.