IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/indbez/314325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typologische Analysen zur statistischen Kontextualisierung von Fallstudien. Vorschlag für sequentielle und simultane Mixed Method-Designs
[Typological analyses for statistical contextualisation of case studies. Proposal for sequential and simultaneous mixed methods designs]

Author

Listed:
  • Matiaske, Wenzel

Abstract

Die im Forschungsfeld der industriellen Beziehungen häufige Methodik der Fallstudie weist neben Vorteilen mit der oft ungeklärten Verortung im großzahligen Bild der Statistik einen gravierenden Nachteil auf. Im Kontext von Mixed Method-Designs wird die Möglichkeit der gezielten Auswahl von Fällen auf der Basis von Clusteranalysen erörtert, um typische Fallstudien zu gewinnen. Wenn sich die sequentielle Vorgehensweise als zu zeitintensiv erweist, können simultane Erhebungen oder auch großzahlige Sekundärdaten und Fallstudien sowie überlappende Informationen zur Verortung von Fällen in typologischen Analysen genutzt werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Matiaske, Wenzel, 2022. "Typologische Analysen zur statistischen Kontextualisierung von Fallstudien. Vorschlag für sequentielle und simultane Mixed Method-Designs [Typological analyses for statistical contextualisation of," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 29(2), pages 117-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:314325
    DOI: 10.3224/indbez.v29i2.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/314325/1/41715-43941-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3224/indbez.v29i2.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rasner, Anika & Frick, Joachim R. & Grabka, Markus M., 2013. "Statistical Matching of Administrative and Survey Data: An Application to Wealth Inequality Analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(2), pages 192-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatriz Larraz, 2015. "Decomposing the Gini Inequality Index," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(3), pages 508-533, August.
    2. Markus Knell & Reinhard Koman, 2022. "Pension Entitlements and Net Wealth in Austria (Markus Knell, Reinhard Koman)," Working Papers 238, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    3. Lüthen Holger & Schröder Carsten & Grabka Markus M. & Goebel Jan & Mika Tatjana & Brüggmann Daniel & Ellert Sebastian & Penz Hannah, 2022. "SOEP-RV: Linking German Socio-Economic Panel Data to Pension Records," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 242(2), pages 291-307, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Clusteranalyse; Fallstudie; Korrespondenzanalyse; Mixed Method-Design; cluster analysis; case study; correspondence analysis; mixed method design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:314325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/indbez/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.