IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/228483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The anxiety dilemma: Locating the Western Balkans in the age of anxiety

Author

Listed:
  • Cupać, Jelena

Abstract

The paper seeks to locate the Western Balkans in the current age of anxiety. By using the concept of ontological security as its overarching theoretical frame, the paper first develops a concept of anxiety dilemma. The anxiety dilemma refers to a situation in which a social order that provides one group of people with a sense of ontological security is a perceived source of anxiety for the other group and vice versa. The paper proposes that such a dilemma characterizes the present age of anxiety. Trapped in this dilemma are the proponents and the contesters of the liberal (international) order and globalization, often referred to in the literature as cosmopolitans and communitarians. The paper argues that the Western Balkan countries occupy an ambivalent position in this anxiety dilemma. Their governments combine liberal-democratic justification with autocratic tendencies. The paper discusses how the Western Balkans came to occupy this position. It singles out four reasons: (1) the region's authoritarian legacy; (2) ethnonationalism coupled with stateand nation-building projects; (3) search for external legitimacy; and (4) the EU's abandonment of the inextricable link between peace and democracy. The case of the Western Balkans yields another important observation: that local anxiety dilemmas are nested in global anxiety dilemma. The paper makes two contributions. The first one is theoretical, and it consists of furthering the concept of ontological security such that it theorizes ontological security as a systemic inter-group phenomenon. The second contribution is analytical, and it consists in locating the Western Balkans in the ongoing struggles over globalization and the liberal (international) order.

Suggested Citation

  • Cupać, Jelena, 2020. "The anxiety dilemma: Locating the Western Balkans in the age of anxiety," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 7-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:228483
    DOI: 10.5937/jrs15-25359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/228483/1/Full-text-article-Cupac-The-anxiety-dilemma.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5937/jrs15-25359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teney, Céline & Lacewell, Onawa Promise & De Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: attitudes and ideologies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(4), pages 575-595.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liesbet Hooghe & Tobias Lenz & Gary Marks, 2019. "Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 731-743, December.
    2. Irina Ciornei & Ettore Recchi, 2017. "At the Source of European Solidarity: Assessing the Effects of Cross-border Practices and Political Attitudes," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 468-485, May.
    3. Andreas C. Goldberg & Erika J. van Elsas & Claes H. De Vreese, 2021. "Eurovisions: An Exploration and Explanation of Public Preferences for Future EU Scenarios," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 222-241, March.
    4. Nicola Pensiero, 2020. "To leave or not to leave? Understanding the support for the United Kingdom membership in the European Union: Identity, attitudes towards the political system and socio-economic status," Rationality and Society, , vol. 32(3), pages 255-277, August.
    5. Sander Kunst & Theresa Kuhn & Herman G van de Werfhorst, 2020. "Does education decrease Euroscepticism? A regression discontinuity design using compulsory schooling reforms in four European countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(1), pages 24-42, March.
    6. Andreas Bergh & Irina Mirkina & Therese Nilsson, 2020. "Can social spending cushion the inequality effect of globalization?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 104-142, March.
    7. Marcello Natili & Fedra Negri, 2023. "Disentangling (new) labour market divides: outsiders’ and globalization losers’ socio-economic risks in Europe," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1561-1585, April.
    8. Teney, Céline & Strijbis, Oliver & Carol, Sarah & Tepe, Senem, 2018. "Elite survey of the bridging project: "The political sociology of cosmopolitanism and communitarianism". Technical report," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Migration, Integration, Transnationalization SP VI 2018-105, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Michele Roccato & Nicoletta Cavazza & Pasquale Colloca & Silvia Russo, 2020. "Three Roads to Populism? An Italian Field Study on the 2019 European Election," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1222-1235, July.
    10. Sharon Baute, 2023. "Mass Euroscepticism revisited: The role of distributive justice," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(4), pages 625-644, December.
    11. Eick, Gianna Maria, 2023. "Welfare Euroscepticism and Socioeconomic Status," SocArXiv cvzh5, Center for Open Science.
    12. Piotr Radkiewicz & Tomasz Jarmakowski-Kostrzanowski, 2021. "Liberals Versus Communitarians: Psychosocial Sources of the Conflict Over Democracy in Today’s Poland," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    13. Cruzatti C., John, 2021. "Free Trade Agreements and Development: a Global Analysis with Local Data," Working Papers 0702, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    14. Andreas C Goldberg & Erika J van Elsas & Claes H de Vreese, 2021. "One union, different futures? Public preferences for the EU's future and their explanations in 10 EU countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(4), pages 721-740, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:228483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.