Reforming the Bretton Woods Institutions
: There is an urgent need of fundamental reforms of IBRD and IMF. Both institutions have repeatedly violated their own Articles of Agreement, creating damage to their members. Thwarting its founders’ intentions the IBRD has refrained from shouldering risks appropriately. This paper shows how financial accountability and professional standards comparable to private consultants can be introduced for both projects and programmes. The grave systemic moral hazard that these Institutions gain financially and institutionally from damages negligently done to their clients must be removed. One solution recommended for programmes was first proposed at the University of Zagreb in 1987.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 5 (2002)
Issue (Month): Special Conference Issue (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +385 1 233-5633
Fax: +385 1 238-3333
Web page: http://www.efzg.hr/Email:
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, Trg J. F. Kennedy 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.|
Web: http://www.efzg.hr/default.aspx?id=6045 Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:zirebs:v:5:y:2002:i:sci:p:97-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jurica Šimurina)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.