IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/busexc/v11y2017i1p91-120.html

Corporate Social Responsibility As Key Criteria For Investment Of Pension Funds In Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Sopta

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb)

  • Martin Sopta

Abstract

Fierce changes in the labor department, the pressure to achieve higher flexibility and deregulation of the labor market narrow the base and coverage for retirement insurance. Longer periods of unemployment and work pursuit are already almost a rule, rather than exception, and as new technologies lower the need for real workers, it is easy to imagine the reality where economic growth will not necessarily be positively correlated with the growth on the labor market. In those conditions, the need for social solidarity and government social responsibility should be higher. Corporate social responsibility, especially the area of employee rights, serves as guidance for further growth and development of the company, at the same time taking into account the social, ecological and other components. While completing the process, one must not forget fulfilling the needs of not only the employees, but also the needs of the shareholders that will surely endorse the growth of the company, as well as the correlated increase in the value of the share that is directly stimulated by the phenomenon of corporate social responsibility. This paper elaborates on the possibility of including corporate social responsibility in the decision-making criteria when mandatory pension funds consider investing in Croatia. Within current market opportunities, those pension funds are becoming majority owners of large joint-stock companies, which creates the possibility of their crucial influence as big market protagonists in decision-making related with corporate social responsibility. This paper gives some examples from practices of pension funds in developed countries, as well as ways of including corporate social responsibility in the main flows of how joint-stock companies are run.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Sopta & Martin Sopta, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility As Key Criteria For Investment Of Pension Funds In Croatia," Poslovna izvrsnost-Business Excellence, University of Zagreb Faculty of Economics & Business, vol. 11(1), pages 91-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:91-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/269694
    Download Restriction: None
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Bird & Anthony D. Hall & Francesco Momentè & Francesco Reggiani, 2007. "What Corporate Social Responsibility Activities are Valued by the Market?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 189-206, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Hajar Mouatassim Lahmini & Abdelmajid Ibenrissoul, 2017. "Quel effet de la Responsabilité Sociétale de l'Entreprise sur la performance financière d'un opérateur minier/ Approche par l'Analyse Coûts-Bénéfices," Post-Print hal-01746022, HAL.
    3. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    4. I. Girerd-Potin & S. Jimenez-Garces & Pascal Louvet, 2014. "Which Dimensions of Social Responsibility Concern Financial Investors?," Post-Print halshs-01337706, HAL.
    5. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Thomas Kaspereit & Kerstin Lopatta, 2013. "The Value Relevance of SAM's Corporate Sustainability Ranking and GRI Sustainability Reporting in the European Stock Markets," ZenTra Working Papers in Transnational Studies 19 / 2013, ZenTra - Center for Transnational Studies, revised Oct 2013.
    7. Tsai, Wen-Hsien & Hsu, Jui-Ling, 2008. "Corporate social responsibility programs choice and costs assessment in the airline industry—A hybrid model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 188-196.
    8. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.
    9. Andrea Pérez & Carlos López & María del Mar García-De los Salmones, 2017. "An empirical exploration of the link between reporting to stakeholders and corporate social responsibility reputation in the Spanish context," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 668-698, March.
    10. Waratta Authayarat & Hiroyuki Umemuro, 2012. "Affective Management and its Effects on Management Performance," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 8(2), pages 5-25.
    11. Victoria Bogdan & Claudia Diana Sabău-Popa & Marcel-Ioan Boloș & Dorina-Nicoleta Popa & Mărioara Beleneși, 2022. "Tracking Waste Management Information Disclosure Behavior Connected to Financial Performance through Moderating Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Zainab Al Mubarak & Anji Ben Hamed & Muneer Al Mubarak, 2018. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on bank’s corporate image," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 710-722, November.
    13. Timo Busch & Nils Lehmann & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Negative Externalities, and Financial Risk: The Case of Climate Change," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 12-102/IV/DSF40, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Hajer Tebini & Bouchra M’Zali & Pascal Lang & Paz Méndez-Rodrı́guez, 2015. "Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Controversial Relationship," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Enrique Ballestero & Blanca Pérez-Gladish & Ana Garcia-Bernabeu (ed.), Socially Responsible Investment, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 53-73, Springer.
    15. Rouine, Ibtissem & Ammari, Aymen & Bruna, Maria Giuseppina, 2022. "Nonlinear impacts of CSR performance on firm risk: New evidence using a panel smooth threshold regression," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    16. Kerstin Lopatta & Thomas Kaspereit, 2014. "The World Capital Markets’ Perception of Sustainability and the Impact of the Financial Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 475-500, July.
    17. Qiao, Tongshuai & Han, Liyan & Liu, Yang, 2021. "Does targeted poverty alleviation disclosure improve stock performance?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Jiung Lee & Hakjin Chung & Na-Eun Cho, 2023. "The Effects of Operational Efficiency and Environmental Risk on the Adoption of Environmental Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Pamela Queen, 2015. "Enlightened Shareholder Maximization: Is this Strategy Achievable?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 683-694, March.
    20. Busaya Virakul & Kalayanee Koonmee & Gary N. McLean, 2009. "CSR activities in award‐winning Thai companies," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 178-199, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:91-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dario Dunković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.