IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wut/journl/v30y2020i4p81-94id1488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moving Average control charts for Burr X and Inverse Gaussian distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Ambreen Shafqat
  • Muhammad Aslam
  • Mohammed Albassam

Abstract

The Burr X and inverse Gaussian (IG) distributions have been considered to design an attribute control chart for time truncated life test with the moving average (MA) scheme w. The presentation of the MA control chart has been estimated in terms of average run length (ARL) by using the Monte Carlo simulation. The ARL is determined for different values of sample sizes, MA statistics size, parameters’ values, and specified average run length. The performance of this new MA attribute control chart has been compared with the usual time truncated control chart for Burr X and IG distributions. The performance of a new control chart is better than that of the existing control chart.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambreen Shafqat & Muhammad Aslam & Mohammed Albassam, 2020. "Moving Average control charts for Burr X and Inverse Gaussian distributions," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 30(4), pages 81-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:30:y:2020:i:4:p:81-94:id:1488
    DOI: 10.37190/ord200406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/1488%20-%20published.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.37190/ord200406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fu, James C. & Spiring, Fred A. & Xie, Hansheng, 2002. "On the average run lengths of quality control schemes using a Markov chain approach," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 369-380, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markos V. Koutras & Sotirios Bersimis & Demetrios L. Antzoulakos, 2006. "Improving the Performance of the Chi-square Control Chart via Runs Rules," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 409-426, September.
    2. Tung-Lung Wu, 2020. "Conditional waiting time distributions of runs and patterns and their applications," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(2), pages 531-543, April.
    3. Hsing-Ming Chang & James C. Fu, 2022. "On Distribution and Average Run Length of a Two-Stage Control Process," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2723-2742, December.
    4. Ambreen Shafqat & Muhammad Aslam & Mohammed Albassam, 2020. "Moving Average control charts for Burr X and Inverse Gaussian distributions," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 30(4), pages 81-94.
    5. Jungtaek Oh & Christian H. Weiß, 2020. "On the Individuals Chart with Supplementary Runs Rules under Serial Dependence," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1257-1273, September.
    6. Chakraborti, S. & Eryilmaz, S. & Human, S.W., 2009. "A phase II nonparametric control chart based on precedence statistics with runs-type signaling rules," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1054-1065, February.
    7. Lin, Yu-Chang & Chou, Chao-Yu, 2005. "On the design of variable sample size and sampling intervals charts under non-normality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 249-261, May.
    8. M. V. Koutras & S. Bersimis & P. E. Maravelakis, 2007. "Statistical Process Control using Shewhart Control Charts with Supplementary Runs Rules," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 207-224, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:30:y:2020:i:4:p:81-94:id:1488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Kasperski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iopwrpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.