IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/rpbfmp/v16y2013i01ns0219091513500021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors in Managing Actuarial Assumptions for Pension Fair Value: Implications for IAS 19

Author

Listed:
  • Audrey Wen-hsin Hsu

    (Department of Accounting National Taiwan University, 85 Roosevelt Rs. Sec. 4 Taipei, 106, Taiwan)

  • Chung-Fern Wu

    (Department of Accounting National Taiwan University, 85 Roosevelt Rs. Sec. 4 Taipei, 106, Taiwan)

  • Jui-Chia Lin

    (Department of Accounting National Taiwan University, 85 Roosevelt Rs. Sec. 4 Taipei, 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

Corporate managers make several discretionary assumptions (i.e., the rate of salary growth and assumed return rate of pension plan assets) in calculating the fair value of pension assets and value of pension liabilities. In this study, we examine the factors that can induce managers to increase (decrease) fair value of pension assets (liabilities) through pension assumptions. We use the Taiwan setting as a natural experiment because Taiwan is planning to adopt IFRS from 2013 on. The estimation of pension asset (liability) value is similar between Taiwan accounting standards (i.e., TFAS 18) and international accounting standards (IAS 19); however, fair value is only disclosed in the financial statements under TFAS 18, but is required to be recognized in the balance sheet under IAS 19. The findings under TFAS 18 can provide important implications for future adoption of IAS 19. Using two key inputs for pension pricing model, this study finds that companies are inclined to increase (decrease) the value of pension assets (liabilities) by rising (lowering) the assumed expected rate of asset returns (expected salary growth). The manipulation is more pronounced for firms with high distress risk and complex ownership structure. Prior studies find that once firms are required to recognize the fair value (i.e., adopting IAS 19) as opposed to disclose the information (i.e., TFAS 18), firms have higher incentives to manipulate the model inputs. This suggests that the regulator needs to specify the authoritative enforcement rules regarding fair value estimation, and provides more insights on firms with high distress risk and complex ownership structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrey Wen-hsin Hsu & Chung-Fern Wu & Jui-Chia Lin, 2013. "Factors in Managing Actuarial Assumptions for Pension Fair Value: Implications for IAS 19," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:16:y:2013:i:01:n:s0219091513500021
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219091513500021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091513500021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219091513500021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kun Yu, 2016. "Excess of the PBO over the ABO and hard pension freezes," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 819-846, May.
    2. Staszel Anna & Hołda Artur, 2019. "The Effect of the Changes in Accounting Estimates of the Discount Rate to the Costs on Account of Creating Provisions," Financial Sciences. Nauki o Finansach, Sciendo, vol. 24(1), pages 94-114, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pension accounting; fair value accounting; IAS 19;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:16:y:2013:i:01:n:s0219091513500021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.