IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v181y2018i4p372-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradox of Administrative Decentralization Reform in Young Asian Democracies: South Korea and Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Inhye Heo

Abstract

It is generally perceived that administrative decentralization reform in young democracies is a promise to improve democracy from below. Yet, in terms of democratic development, the impact of this process is ambivalent, and can be described as a paradox of reform. This article argues that preemptive countermeasures that offset problems predicted to emerge as the reform proceeds should be formulated as part of the reform through introducing a preventive policy paradigm in the area of democratic reform policy. This is to alleviate or prevent the creation of the paradox and to contribute to democratic development through enhancing people's satisfaction with the newly democratized government. To this end, this study examines administrative decentralization reform in South Korea and Indonesia and uncovers these reforms’ paradoxes. These two cases are particularly worthy of study, since their young democratic governments lack countermeasures against predictable reform problems, intensifying the paradox. I argue that the implications drawn from these two cases for methods of enhancing democratic development in other young democracies are worth heeding. En general, se percibe que la reforma de descentralización administrativa en las democracias jóvenes es una promesa para mejorar la democracia desde abajo. Sin embargo, en términos de desarrollo democrático, el impacto de este proceso es ambivalente y se puede describir como una paradoja de la reforma. Este artículo sostiene que las medidas preventivas que compensan los problemas que se prevé que surjan a medida que avanza la reforma deben formularse como parte de la reforma mediante la introducción de un paradigma de política preventiva en el área de la política de reforma democrática. Esto es para aliviar o prevenir la creación de la paradoja y contribuir al desarrollo democrático mediante la mejora de la satisfacción de las personas con el gobierno recientemente democratizado. Con este fin, este estudio examina la reforma de la descentralización administrativa en Corea del Sur e Indonesia y descubre las paradojas de las reformas. Por último, señala las implicaciones en los métodos para mejorar el desarrollo democrático en las democracias jóvenes. Se adoptó un enfoque de estrategia múltiple, que incluyó una entrevista en profundidad y la recopilación de datos secundarios, con el fin de mejorar la validez y la fiabilidad del estudio. 人们普遍认为,年轻的民主国家实行行政分权改革能确保从下至上改善民主。然而,就民主发展而言,这一进程的影响喜忧参半,这可以说是改革的悖论。本文笔者认为,政府应该在民主改革政策领域中引入预防性政策范例,从而制定先发制人的对策,以作为部分改革内容预防改革进程中可能出现的问题。一方面这是为了减轻或防止悖论的产生,另一方面是为了提高人民对新型民主政府的满意度从而有助民主发展。为此,本文通过研究韩国和印度尼西亚的行政分权改革,揭示了改革的悖论,最后对如何改善年轻民主国家的民主发展提供了启示。本文采用多策略方法,包括深度访谈和二次数据收集以提高研究的有效性和可靠性。

Suggested Citation

  • Inhye Heo, 2018. "The Paradox of Administrative Decentralization Reform in Young Asian Democracies: South Korea and Indonesia," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 181(4), pages 372-402, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:181:y:2018:i:4:p:372-402
    DOI: 10.1177/0043820018813474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820018813474
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0043820018813474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:181:y:2018:i:4:p:372-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.