IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v181y2018i4p372-402.html

The Paradox of Administrative Decentralization Reform in Young Asian Democracies: South Korea and Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Inhye Heo

Abstract

It is generally perceived that administrative decentralization reform in young democracies is a promise to improve democracy from below. Yet, in terms of democratic development, the impact of this process is ambivalent, and can be described as a paradox of reform. This article argues that preemptive countermeasures that offset problems predicted to emerge as the reform proceeds should be formulated as part of the reform through introducing a preventive policy paradigm in the area of democratic reform policy. This is to alleviate or prevent the creation of the paradox and to contribute to democratic development through enhancing people's satisfaction with the newly democratized government. To this end, this study examines administrative decentralization reform in South Korea and Indonesia and uncovers these reforms’ paradoxes. These two cases are particularly worthy of study, since their young democratic governments lack countermeasures against predictable reform problems, intensifying the paradox. I argue that the implications drawn from these two cases for methods of enhancing democratic development in other young democracies are worth heeding. En general, se percibe que la reforma de descentralización administrativa en las democracias jóvenes es una promesa para mejorar la democracia desde abajo. Sin embargo, en términos de desarrollo democrático, el impacto de este proceso es ambivalente y se puede describir como una paradoja de la reforma. Este artículo sostiene que las medidas preventivas que compensan los problemas que se prevé que surjan a medida que avanza la reforma deben formularse como parte de la reforma mediante la introducción de un paradigma de política preventiva en el área de la política de reforma democrática. Esto es para aliviar o prevenir la creación de la paradoja y contribuir al desarrollo democrático mediante la mejora de la satisfacción de las personas con el gobierno recientemente democratizado. Con este fin, este estudio examina la reforma de la descentralización administrativa en Corea del Sur e Indonesia y descubre las paradojas de las reformas. Por último, señala las implicaciones en los métodos para mejorar el desarrollo democrático en las democracias jóvenes. Se adoptó un enfoque de estrategia múltiple, que incluyó una entrevista en profundidad y la recopilación de datos secundarios, con el fin de mejorar la validez y la fiabilidad del estudio. 人们普遍认为,年轻的民主国家实行行政分权改革能确保从下至上改善民主。然而,就民主发展而言,这一进程的影响喜忧参半,这可以说是改革的悖论。本文笔者认为,政府应该在民主改革政策领域中引入预防性政策范例,从而制定先发制人的对策,以作为部分改革内容预防改革进程中可能出现的问题。一方面这是为了减轻或防止悖论的产生,另一方面是为了提高人民对新型民主政府的满意度从而有助民主发展。为此,本文通过研究韩国和印度尼西亚的行政分权改革,揭示了改革的悖论,最后对如何改善年轻民主国家的民主发展提供了启示。本文采用多策略方法,包括深度访谈和二次数据收集以提高研究的有效性和可靠性。

Suggested Citation

  • Inhye Heo, 2018. "The Paradox of Administrative Decentralization Reform in Young Asian Democracies: South Korea and Indonesia," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 181(4), pages 372-402, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:181:y:2018:i:4:p:372-402
    DOI: 10.1177/0043820018813474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820018813474
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0043820018813474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Escobar‐Lemmon & Ashley D. Ross, 2014. "Does Decentralization Improve Perceptions of Accountability? Attitudinal Evidence from Colombia," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 175-188, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charly Ondobo Tsala & Raymond Ekodo & Henri Tabi Ngoa, 2025. "Does Decentralization Decrease State Fragility? Evidence from Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(4), pages 15228-15259, October.
    2. Andi Rahmat Hidayat & Otto Hospes & C. J. A. M. Termeer, 2025. "Why Democratization and Decentralization in Indonesia Have Mixed Results on the Ground: A Systematic Literature Review," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(2), pages 159-172, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Lei & Luo, Changtuo, 2023. "Does administrative decentralization promote outward foreign direct investment and productivity? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Nicola Pontarollo & Mercy Orellana & Joselin Segovia, 2020. "The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in a Developing Country: The Ecuadorian Case," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(8), pages 3007-3035, December.
    3. Ryota Nakatani & Qianqian Zhang & Isaura Garcia Valdes, 2024. "Health Expenditure Decentralization and Health Outcomes: The Importance of Governance," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 54(1), pages 59-87.
    4. Cook, Nathan J. & Wright, Glenn D. & Andersson, Krister P., 2017. "Local Politics of Forest Governance: Why NGO Support Can Reduce Local Government Responsiveness," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 203-214.
    5. Kendall D. Funk & Erica Owen, 2020. "Consequences of an Anti‐Corruption Experiment for Local Government Performance in Brazil," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 444-468, March.
    6. Ryota Nakatani & Qianqian Zhang & Isaura Garcia Valdes, 2022. "Fiscal Decentralization Improves Social Outcomes When Countries Have Good Governance," IMF Working Papers 2022/111, International Monetary Fund.
    7. Sebastián Pantoja-Barrios, 2025. "Taxation, political engagement, and public goods provision in Colombia's conflict-affected regions," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2025-90, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Axel Dreher & Kai Gehring & Christos Kotsogiannis & Silvia Marchesi, 2018. "Information transmission within federal fiscal architectures: theory and evidence," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 70(1), pages 243-265.
    9. Antonio N. Bojanic, 2016. "Fiscal Decentralization, Economic Freedom, and Political and Civil Liberties in the Americas," Working Papers 1609, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    10. Guccio, Calogero & Mazza, Isidoro & Mignosa, Anna & Rizzo, Ilde, 2018. "A round trip on decentralization in the tourism sector," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 140-155.
    11. Geiguen Shin & Byong‐Kuen Jhee, 2021. "Better service delivery, more satisfied citizens? The mediating effects of local government management capacity in South Korea," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 42-67, January.
    12. Antonio N. Bojanic, 2018. "The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Accountability, Economic Freedom, and Political and Civil Liberties in the Americas," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Jae Hyun Lee & Jaekwon Suh, 2021. "Decentralisation and government trust in South Korea: Distinguishing local government trust from national government trust," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 68-93, January.
    14. Wang, Liuhong & Ba, Zhichao & Wang, Yuefen, 2025. "How does adoption behavior towards ICT policies affect digital divides? Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Leonardo Letelier S. & José Luis Sáez Lozano, 2020. "Fiscal Decentralization and Life Satisfaction in Chile," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper2007, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:181:y:2018:i:4:p:372-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.