IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v24y2021i1p34-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling a predictive maintenance management architecture to meet industry 4.0 requirements: A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Helge Nordal
  • Idriss El‐Thalji

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is the latest paradigm of industrial production enabling a new level of organizing and controlling the entire value chain within a product life cycle by creating a dynamic and real‐time understanding of cross‐company behaviors. It is expected to have a considerable impact in the oil and gas (O&G) sector by revolutionizing current predictive maintenance and operation optimization. There are several challenges to be overcome before the Industry 4.0 vision is achieved: a standardized reference architecture, a business model, robust services, and products are all lacking. This paper develops a reference architecture for an intelligent maintenance management system that complies with Industry 4.0 visions and requirements. The industrial needs were derived from stakeholders and use case scenarios using a case study methodology. Systems engineering methods were applied to transfer the needs of the existing maintenance management system into a desired functional architecture. The new and upgraded requirements are predominantly related to advanced data analytics, resulting in new and modified functions within the traditional “Reporting” and “Analyses” modules. A more complex maintenance program is created through interfaces between various enabled data categories (historical records, real‐time measurements of performance and health, expert‐just‐in‐time). The study points to the changes required in the classical O&G maintenance management process to comply with Industry 4.0 vision and requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Helge Nordal & Idriss El‐Thalji, 2021. "Modeling a predictive maintenance management architecture to meet industry 4.0 requirements: A case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 34-50, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:34-50
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21565
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liliane Pintelon & Alejandro Parodi-Herz, 2008. "Maintenance: An Evolutionary Perspective," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 2, pages 21-48, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    2. Goossens, Adriaan J.M. & Basten, Rob J.I., 2015. "Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; An application for naval ships," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 31-41.
    3. repec:thr:techub:v:4:y:2022:i:6:p:58-83 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Francesco Corman & Sander Kraijema & Milinko Godjevac & Gabriel Lodewijks, 2017. "Optimizing preventive maintenance policy: A data-driven application for a light rail braking system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 534-545, October.
    5. Offole Florence, 2022. "Modeling and fault detection of a turbofan engine by deep-learning approach," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 4(6), pages 58-83.
    6. Elizaveta Gavrikova & Irina Volkova & Yegor Burda, 2020. "Strategic Aspects of Asset Management: An Overview of Current Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-31, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:34-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.