IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v40y2020i1p117-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Scenario Ensemble‐Based Framework for Hurricane Evacuation Modeling: Part 2—Hazard Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Blanton
  • Kendra Dresback
  • Brian Colle
  • Randy Kolar
  • Humberto Vergara
  • Yang Hong
  • Nicholas Leonardo
  • Rachel Davidson
  • Linda Nozick
  • Tricia Wachtendorf

Abstract

Hurricane track and intensity can change rapidly in unexpected ways, thus making predictions of hurricanes and related hazards uncertain. This inherent uncertainty often translates into suboptimal decision‐making outcomes, such as unnecessary evacuation. Representing this uncertainty is thus critical in evacuation planning and related activities. We describe a physics‐based hazard modeling approach that (1) dynamically accounts for the physical interactions among hazard components and (2) captures hurricane evolution uncertainty using an ensemble method. This loosely coupled model system provides a framework for probabilistic water inundation and wind speed levels for a new, risk‐based approach to evacuation modeling, described in a companion article in this issue. It combines the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) meteorological model, the Coupled Routing and Excess STorage (CREST) hydrologic model, and the ADvanced CIRCulation (ADCIRC) storm surge, tide, and wind‐wave model to compute inundation levels and wind speeds for an ensemble of hurricane predictions. Perturbations to WRF's initial and boundary conditions and different model physics/parameterizations generate an ensemble of storm solutions, which are then used to drive the coupled hydrologic + hydrodynamic models. Hurricane Isabel (2003) is used as a case study to illustrate the ensemble‐based approach. The inundation, river runoff, and wind hazard results are strongly dependent on the accuracy of the mesoscale meteorological simulations, which improves with decreasing lead time to hurricane landfall. The ensemble envelope brackets the observed behavior while providing “best‐case” and “worst‐case” scenarios for the subsequent risk‐based evacuation model.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Blanton & Kendra Dresback & Brian Colle & Randy Kolar & Humberto Vergara & Yang Hong & Nicholas Leonardo & Rachel Davidson & Linda Nozick & Tricia Wachtendorf, 2020. "An Integrated Scenario Ensemble‐Based Framework for Hurricane Evacuation Modeling: Part 2—Hazard Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 117-133, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:117-133
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.13004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.13004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rambha, Tarun & Nozick, Linda K. & Davidson, Rachel & Yi, Wenqi & Yang, Kun, 2021. "A stochastic optimization model for staged hospital evacuation during hurricanes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Pulong Ma & Georgios Karagiannis & Bledar A. Konomi & Taylor G. Asher & Gabriel R. Toro & Andrew T. Cox, 2022. "Multifidelity computer model emulation with high‐dimensional output: An application to storm surge," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 861-883, August.
    3. Gilberto Montibeller & L. Alberto Franco & Ashley Carreras, 2020. "A Risk Analysis Framework for Prioritizing and Managing Biosecurity Threats," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(11), pages 2462-2477, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:117-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.