IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v33y2013i6p1100-1115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variability and Uncertainty Analysis of the Cross‐Contamination Ratios of Salmonella During Pork Cutting

Author

Listed:
  • Joost Smid
  • Rob de Jonge
  • Arie H. Havelaar
  • Annemarie Pielaat

Abstract

The transfer ratio of bacteria from one surface to another is often estimated from laboratory experiments and quantified by dividing the expected number of bacteria on the recipient surface by the expected number of bacteria on the donor surface. Yet, the expected number of bacteria on each surface is uncertain due to the limited number of colonies that are counted and/or samples that can be analyzed. The expected transfer ratio is, therefore, also uncertain and its estimate may exceed 1 if real transfer is close to 100%. In addition, the transferred fractions vary over experiments but it is unclear, using this approach, how to combine uncertainty and variability into one estimate for the transfer ratio. A Bayesian network model was proposed that allows the combination of uncertainty within one experiment and variability over multiple experiments and prevents inappropriate values for the transfer ratio. Model functionality was shown using data from a laboratory experiment in which the transfer of Salmonella was determined from contaminated pork meat to a butcher's knife, and vice versa. Recovery efficiency of bacteria from both surfaces was also determined and accounted for in the analysis. Transfer ratio probability distributions showed a large variability, with a mean value of 0.19 for the transfer of Salmonella from pork meat to the knife and 0.58 for the transfer of Salmonella from the knife to pork meat. The proposed Bayesian model can be used for analyzing data from similar study designs in which uncertainty should be combined with variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Joost Smid & Rob de Jonge & Arie H. Havelaar & Annemarie Pielaat, 2013. "Variability and Uncertainty Analysis of the Cross‐Contamination Ratios of Salmonella During Pork Cutting," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 1100-1115, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:6:p:1100-1115
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01908.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01908.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01908.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maarten Nauta & Ine Van Der Fels‐Klerx & Arie Havelaar, 2005. "A Poultry‐Processing Model for Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 85-98, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduardo de Freitas Costa & Luis Gustavo Corbellini & Ana Paula Serafini Poeta da Silva & Maarten Nauta, 2017. "A Stochastic Model to Assess the Effect of Meat Inspection Practices on the Contamination of the Pig Carcasses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1849-1864, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arie H. Havelaar & Marie‐Josee J. Mangen & Aline A. De Koeijer & Marc‐Jeroen Bogaardt & Eric G. Evers & Wilma F. Jacobs‐Reitsma & Wilfrid Van Pelt & Jaap A. Wagenaar & G. Ardine De Wit & Henk Van Der , 2007. "Effectiveness and Efficiency of Controlling Campylobacter on Broiler Chicken Meat," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 831-844, August.
    2. Elise Billoir & Jean‐Baptiste Denis & Natalie Commeau & Marie Cornu & Véronique Zuliani, 2011. "Probabilistic Modeling of the Fate of Listeria Monocytogenes in Diced Bacon During the Manufacturing Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 237-254, February.
    3. Sido D. Mylius & Maarten J. Nauta & Arie H. Havelaar, 2007. "Cross‐Contamination During Food Preparation: A Mechanistic Model Applied to Chicken‐Borne Campylobacter," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 803-813, August.
    4. Martijn Bouwknegt & Anne B. Knol & Jeroen P. van der Sluijs & Eric G. Evers, 2014. "Uncertainty of Population Risk Estimates for Pathogens Based on QMRA or Epidemiology: A Case Study of Campylobacter in the Netherlands," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 847-864, May.
    5. Eduardo de Freitas Costa & Luis Gustavo Corbellini & Ana Paula Serafini Poeta da Silva & Maarten Nauta, 2017. "A Stochastic Model to Assess the Effect of Meat Inspection Practices on the Contamination of the Pig Carcasses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1849-1864, October.
    6. H. J. Van der Fels‐Klerx & Roger M. Cooke & Maarten N. Nauta & Louis H. Goossens & Arie H. Havelaar, 2005. "A Structured Expert Judgment Study for a Model of Campylobacter Transmission During Broiler‐Chicken Processing," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 109-124, February.
    7. Maarten J. Nauta & Wilma F. Jacobs‐Reitsma & Arie H. Havelaar, 2007. "A Risk Assessment Model for Campylobacter in Broiler Meat," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 845-861, August.
    8. Dorota Kurowicka & Maarten Nauta & Katarzyna Jozwiak & Roger Cooke, 2010. "Updating Parameters of the Chicken Processing Line Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 934-944, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:6:p:1100-1115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.