IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v25y2005i1p85-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Poultry‐Processing Model for Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Maarten Nauta
  • Ine Van Der Fels‐Klerx
  • Arie Havelaar

Abstract

A poultry‐processing model for a quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) of campylobacter is presented, which can also be applied to other QMRAs involving poultry processing. The same basic model is applied in each consecutive stage of industrial processing. It describes the effects of inactivation and removal of the bacteria, and the dynamics of cross‐contamination in terms of the transfer of campylobacter from the intestines to the carcass surface and the environment, from the carcasses to the environment, and from the environment to the carcasses. From the model it can be derived that, in general, the effect of inactivation and removal is dominant for those carcasses with high initial bacterial loads, and cross‐contamination is dominant for those with low initial levels. In other QMRA poultry‐processing models, the input‐output relationship between the numbers of bacteria on the carcasses is usually assumed to be linear on a logarithmic scale. By including some basic mechanistics, it is shown that this may not be realistic. As nonlinear behavior may affect the predicted effects of risk mitigations; this finding is relevant for risk management. Good knowledge of the variability of bacterial loads on poultry entering the process is important. The common practice in microbiology to only present geometric mean of bacterial counts is insufficient: arithmetic mean are more suitable, in particular, to describe the effect of cross‐contamination. The effects of logistic slaughter (scheduled processing) as a risk mitigation strategy are predicted to be small. Some additional complications in applying microbiological data obtained in processing plants are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Maarten Nauta & Ine Van Der Fels‐Klerx & Arie Havelaar, 2005. "A Poultry‐Processing Model for Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 85-98, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:25:y:2005:i:1:p:85-98
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00569.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00569.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00569.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jukka Ranta & Riitta Maijala, 2002. "A Probabilistic Transmission Model of Salmonella in the Primary Broiler Production Chain," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 47-58, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H. J. Van der Fels‐Klerx & Roger M. Cooke & Maarten N. Nauta & Louis H. Goossens & Arie H. Havelaar, 2005. "A Structured Expert Judgment Study for a Model of Campylobacter Transmission During Broiler‐Chicken Processing," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 109-124, February.
    2. Maarten J. Nauta & Wilma F. Jacobs‐Reitsma & Arie H. Havelaar, 2007. "A Risk Assessment Model for Campylobacter in Broiler Meat," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 845-861, August.
    3. Elise Billoir & Jean‐Baptiste Denis & Natalie Commeau & Marie Cornu & Véronique Zuliani, 2011. "Probabilistic Modeling of the Fate of Listeria Monocytogenes in Diced Bacon During the Manufacturing Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 237-254, February.
    4. Dorota Kurowicka & Maarten Nauta & Katarzyna Jozwiak & Roger Cooke, 2010. "Updating Parameters of the Chicken Processing Line Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 934-944, June.
    5. Eduardo de Freitas Costa & Luis Gustavo Corbellini & Ana Paula Serafini Poeta da Silva & Maarten Nauta, 2017. "A Stochastic Model to Assess the Effect of Meat Inspection Practices on the Contamination of the Pig Carcasses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1849-1864, October.
    6. Sido D. Mylius & Maarten J. Nauta & Arie H. Havelaar, 2007. "Cross‐Contamination During Food Preparation: A Mechanistic Model Applied to Chicken‐Borne Campylobacter," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 803-813, August.
    7. Joost Smid & Rob de Jonge & Arie H. Havelaar & Annemarie Pielaat, 2013. "Variability and Uncertainty Analysis of the Cross‐Contamination Ratios of Salmonella During Pork Cutting," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 1100-1115, June.
    8. Arie H. Havelaar & Marie‐Josee J. Mangen & Aline A. De Koeijer & Marc‐Jeroen Bogaardt & Eric G. Evers & Wilma F. Jacobs‐Reitsma & Wilfrid Van Pelt & Jaap A. Wagenaar & G. Ardine De Wit & Henk Van Der , 2007. "Effectiveness and Efficiency of Controlling Campylobacter on Broiler Chicken Meat," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 831-844, August.
    9. Martijn Bouwknegt & Anne B. Knol & Jeroen P. van der Sluijs & Eric G. Evers, 2014. "Uncertainty of Population Risk Estimates for Pathogens Based on QMRA or Epidemiology: A Case Study of Campylobacter in the Netherlands," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 847-864, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatiana V. Kotsofana, 2018. "The Driving Forces Of Inflation And The Mechanisms For Their Implementation In The Russian Economy," Annals of marketing-mba, Department of Marketing, Marketing MBA (RSconsult), vol. 1, April.
    2. Winy Messens & Luis Vivas-Alegre & Saghir Bashir & Giusi Amore & Pablo Romero-Barrios & Marta Hugas, 2013. "Estimating the Public Health Impact of Setting Targets at the European Level for the Reduction of Zoonotic Salmonella in Certain Poultry Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Carolina Plaza Rodríguez & Guido Correia Carreira & Annemarie Käsbohrer, 2018. "A Probabilistic Transmission Model for the Spread of Extended‐Spectrum‐β‐Lactamase and AmpC‐β‐Lactamase‐Producing Escherichia Coli in the Broiler Production Chain," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2659-2682, December.
    4. Antti Mikkelä & Jukka Ranta & Pirkko Tuominen, 2019. "A Modular Bayesian Salmonella Source Attribution Model for Sparse Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(8), pages 1796-1811, August.
    5. Kangas, Susanna & Lyytikainen, Tapani & Peltola, Jukka & Ranta, Jukka & Maijala, Riitta, 2004. "Costs and Benefits of Two Alternative Salmonella Control Policies in Finnish Broiler Production," 84th Seminar, February 8-11, 2004, Zeist, The Netherlands 24981, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:25:y:2005:i:1:p:85-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.