IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v27y2007i6p1519-1533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSP Deposition to the Alveolar Region of the Lung: Implications of Cigarette Design

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Gower
  • David Hammond

Abstract

Ventilated cigarettes were designed to reduce the levels of smoke under machine testing conditions; however, smokers alter their smoking pattern to compensate for the reduction in yields. A relative shift in incidence of lung cancer from the more central lung airways to the alveolar region has also been associated with ventilated cigarette use. Validated mathematical models indicate that particle deposition patterns in the lung depend on particle size and inhalation behavior, including inhalation volume, flow rate, and breath‐hold time. This article finds that most mathematical models underpredict total cigarette smoke particulate (CSP) deposition in the lung, likely because they do not account for coagulation, hygroscopicity, and cloud dynamics, which may increase the effective particle diameter of CSP reaching the lung tissue. The models that include these processes indicate that puff volume would be unlikely to affect particle deposition in the lung, but puff time, inhalation depth, breath‐hold time, and exhalation time may affect total deposition. Most compensation appears to occur through a combination of increased puff volume and puff flow, with possible increases in inhalation depth and breath‐hold time. The complex interaction between the extent of cigarette ventilation, which can affect puffing/inhalation behavior, CSP concentration, and CSP size with CSP dose to the alveolar versus more central lung airways is described. Deposition efficiency in the alveoli could plausibly be increased through compensation, but it is still unclear whether compensation could sufficiently alter patterns of CSP deposition in the lung to elicit a shift in lung cancer sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Gower & David Hammond, 2007. "CSP Deposition to the Alveolar Region of the Lung: Implications of Cigarette Design," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 1519-1533, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:6:p:1519-1533
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00986.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00986.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00986.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shehan Jayasekera & Edward Hensel & Risa Robinson, 2021. "Feasibility of Using the Hexoskin Smart Garment for Natural Environment Observation of Respiration Topography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Shehan Jayasekera & Edward Hensel & Risa Robinson, 2021. "Feasibility Assessment of Wearable Respiratory Monitors for Ambulatory Inhalation Topography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Risa J. Robinson & S. Emma Sarles & Shehan Jayasekera & Aziz al Olayan & A. Gary Difrancesco & Nathan C. Eddingsaas & Edward C. Hensel, 2020. "A Comparison between Cigarette Topography from a One-Week Natural Environment Study to FTC/ISO, Health Canada, and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Puff Profile Standards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:6:p:1519-1533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.