IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3444-d358517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison between Cigarette Topography from a One-Week Natural Environment Study to FTC/ISO, Health Canada, and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Puff Profile Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Risa J. Robinson

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • S. Emma Sarles

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • Shehan Jayasekera

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • Aziz al Olayan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • A. Gary Difrancesco

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • Nathan C. Eddingsaas

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • Edward C. Hensel

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

Abstract

Standardized topography protocols for testing cigarette emissions include the Federal Trade Commission/International Standard Organization (FTC/ISO), the Massachusetts Department of Health (MDPH), and Health Canada (HC). Data are lacking for how well these protocols represent actual use behavior. This study aims to compare puff protocol standards to actual use topography measured in natural environments across a range of cigarette brands. Current smokers between 18 and 65 years of age were recruited. Each participant was provided with a wPUM™ cigarette topography monitor and instructed to use the monitor with their usual brand cigarette ad libitum in their natural environment for one week. Monitors were tested for repeatability, and data were checked for quality and analyzed with the TAP™ topography analysis program. Data from n = 26 participants were analyzed. Puff flow rates ranged from 17.2 to 110.6 mL/s, with a mean (STD) of 40.4 (21.7) mL/s; durations from 0.7 to 3.1 s, with a mean (STD) of 1.5 ± 0.5 s; and volumes from 21.4 to 159.2 mL, with a mean (STD) of 54.9 (29.8) mL. Current topography standards were found to be insufficient to represent smoking across the wide range of real behaviors. These data suggest updated standards are needed such that emissions tests will provide meaningful risk assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Risa J. Robinson & S. Emma Sarles & Shehan Jayasekera & Aziz al Olayan & A. Gary Difrancesco & Nathan C. Eddingsaas & Edward C. Hensel, 2020. "A Comparison between Cigarette Topography from a One-Week Natural Environment Study to FTC/ISO, Health Canada, and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Puff Profile Standards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-10, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3444-:d:358517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie Gower & David Hammond, 2007. "CSP Deposition to the Alveolar Region of the Lung: Implications of Cigarette Design," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 1519-1533, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shehan Jayasekera & Edward Hensel & Risa Robinson, 2021. "Feasibility of Using the Hexoskin Smart Garment for Natural Environment Observation of Respiration Topography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Shehan Jayasekera & Edward Hensel & Risa Robinson, 2021. "Feasibility Assessment of Wearable Respiratory Monitors for Ambulatory Inhalation Topography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shehan Jayasekera & Edward Hensel & Risa Robinson, 2021. "Feasibility Assessment of Wearable Respiratory Monitors for Ambulatory Inhalation Topography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Shehan Jayasekera & Edward Hensel & Risa Robinson, 2021. "Feasibility of Using the Hexoskin Smart Garment for Natural Environment Observation of Respiration Topography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3444-:d:358517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.