IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v16y1996i6p755-762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age and Gender Differences in Perceived Accident Likelihood and Driver Competences

Author

Listed:
  • A. Ian Glendon
  • Lisa Dorn
  • D. Roy Davies
  • Gerald Matthews
  • Ray G. Taylor

Abstract

Road traffic accident involvement rates show clear age and gender differences which may in part be accounted for by differences in risk perception and perceptions of driving competence. The present study extends and replicates that of Matthews and Moran (1986). Young (18–30 years) and older (45–60 years) male and female drivers responded to a questionnaire on perceived accident risk and driving competence (judgment and skill) with respect to themselves and four target groups, and also rated a series of videotaped driving sequences with respect to likelihood of accident occurrence and perceived driving competence. Results showed that effects of rater characteristics were generally confined to the questionnaire. Younger males were perceived as most likely to experience an accident and were judged to be lower than other groups in driving competence. Younger groups showed little bias against older groups and vice versa, but gender‐related bias was apparent. The findings of Matthews and Moran were generally confirmed. The results are discussed with reference to four main issues: (1) demographic bias effects—which are generally weak; (2) stereotyping on the basis of gender and/or age of driver; (3) group‐specific bias; (4) self‐appraisal bias.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Ian Glendon & Lisa Dorn & D. Roy Davies & Gerald Matthews & Ray G. Taylor, 1996. "Age and Gender Differences in Perceived Accident Likelihood and Driver Competences," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 755-762, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:16:y:1996:i:6:p:755-762
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00826.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00826.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00826.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco Alonso & Sergio A. Useche & Eliseo Valle & Cristina Esteban & Javier Gene-Morales, 2021. "Could Road Safety Education (RSE) Help Parents Protect Children? Examining Their Driving Crashes with Children on Board," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Torbjørn Rundmo & Trond Nordfjærn, 2019. "Judgement of Transport Security, Risk Sensitivity and Travel Mode Use in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Henrik Andersson, 2011. "Perception of Own Death Risk: An Assessment of Road‐Traffic Mortality Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(7), pages 1069-1082, July.
    4. Sotiris Vandoros & Georgios Kavetsos & Paul Dolan, 2014. "Greasy Roads: The Impact of Bad Financial News on Road Traffic Accidents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 556-566, March.
    5. James O’Brien, 2018. "Age, autos, and the value of a statistical life," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 51-79, August.
    6. Andersson, Henrik & Lundborg, Petter, 2006. "Perception of Own Death Risk: An Analysis of Road-Traffic and Overall Mortality Risks," Working Papers 2006:1, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:16:y:1996:i:6:p:755-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.