IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/revfec/v39y2021i4p500-521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s really in a deal? Evidence from textual analysis of M&A conference calls

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyao Hu
  • Thomas Shohfi
  • Runzu Wang

Abstract

Using a sample of 814 transcripts from 2011 to 2018, we examine information within merger and acquisition conference calls. Textual analysis reveals significant differences between the content of M&A call transcripts and both contemporaneous corporate press releases and prior earnings conference calls. We find participation of target executive types in M&A calls occurs more frequently in diversifying acquisitions and is related to payment choice consistent with promoting managerial sector‐specific skills and incentive alignment, respectively. Retention of participating target executives is associated with a negative market reaction. We also identify a negative relation between textual sentiment and market reaction consistent with a response to higher levels of information asymmetry. Greater quantitative information, however, is positively related to the market reaction of M&A calls. We develop targeted M&A motive dictionaries to identify financial and strategic content within call transcripts. Consistent with prior literature on merger motivation, deals with more finance (strategy)‐oriented words have a higher (lower) market reaction. Overall, our results show that deal‐related textual analysis explains a highly significant and economically important component of gains/losses to acquirers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyao Hu & Thomas Shohfi & Runzu Wang, 2021. "What’s really in a deal? Evidence from textual analysis of M&A conference calls," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 500-521, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:500-521
    DOI: 10.1002/rfe.1126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/rfe.1126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:500-521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1873-5924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.