IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v37y2017i3p203-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dilemma of “Managing for Results” in China: Won't Let Go

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Gong
  • Paul Collins
  • Hon Chan
  • Ciqi Mei
  • Margaret M. Pearson

Abstract

While China is not often thought of as a prime location for implementation of “managing for results” mechanisms of New Public Management, in fact, the reform era leadership—consistent with implementation of many market mechanisms in the economy—initiated cadre management principles imbued with results‐based techniques. This article discusses how dilemmas inherent in MFR principles play out in China's institutional context. It examines an understudied “punishing for results” technique employed in China, the “hold‐to‐account” system, and demonstrates how this punishment technique reveals inherent dilemmas that also can be expected if applied in other state‐centric developing countries. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Gong & Paul Collins & Hon Chan & Ciqi Mei & Margaret M. Pearson, 2017. "The Dilemma of “Managing for Results” in China: Won't Let Go," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(3), pages 203-216, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:203-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:203-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.