IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v36y2016i2p157-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measured Governance? Policing and Performance Management in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Collins
  • Otwin Marenin
  • Michael Chin‐Chih Chu
  • Andrew Faull

Abstract

The nineties were a period of mass reforms in South African policing. Within a few years of its transition from apartheid to democracy, the South African Police Service (SAPS) had developed a performance measurement tool based on the New York CompStat system. Such tools have been praised for their apparent effectiveness in reducing crime but scorned for the pressures they place on police officers. This article demonstrates that the SAPS' Performance Chart has framed the police as crime fighters, giving little to no regard for community relations or police legitimacy. While organisational rhetoric emphasises police‐community relations and police professionalism, these are absent from the targets by which police are assessed. The unintended consequences were clearly demonstrated when angry residents of Khayelitsha in Cape Town successfully lobbied for a Commission of Inquiry into the failures of policing in 2012. The scandal showed that despite good intentions, the introduction of the Chart has not produced effective, democratic policing. On the contrary, the resulting pressure to ‘perform’ can and has promoted police practices that erode community trust in and cooperation with police. For the SAPS, this is particularly true in the absence of a measure of public confidence or of feelings of safety. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Collins & Otwin Marenin & Michael Chin‐Chih Chu & Andrew Faull, 2016. "Measured Governance? Policing and Performance Management in South Africa," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(2), pages 157-168, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:36:y:2016:i:2:p:157-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:36:y:2016:i:2:p:157-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.