IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v47y2026i6p1570-1587.html

Are Both Quantity and Quality of Green Innovation Exalted in Polluting Firms Under Environmental Regulation?

Author

Listed:
  • Sin‐Som Sergio Tsiong
  • Jiaqi Feng
  • Mingqian Zhang

Abstract

Green innovation plays a crucial role in the context of the low‐carbon economy. Still, it is equally important to focus on gatekeeping the quality of innovation amidst the plethora of innovative outcomes. This article aims to investigate how China's carbon emission trading (CET) pilot will affect both the quantity and quality of green innovation among polluting firms. First, we construct a partial equilibrium model to describe the asymmetric effects of the CET pilot on green innovation. Then, we conduct empirical examinations based on a sample of polluted firms listed on the A‐share market, using patent applications with their citation information. The results show that the CET pilot indeed stimulates the quantity of green innovation through the “leverage effect,” which is also moderated by the social responsibility firms assume. However, the green innovation quality and even the overall technological level are significantly inhibited. The results imply that there exists a certain “innovation illusion” in green innovation among polluting firms listed on the A‐share market, suggesting that more effective incentive policies should be implemented to ensure both quantity and quality are improved synchronically.

Suggested Citation

  • Sin‐Som Sergio Tsiong & Jiaqi Feng & Mingqian Zhang, 2026. "Are Both Quantity and Quality of Green Innovation Exalted in Polluting Firms Under Environmental Regulation?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(6), pages 1570-1587, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:6:p:1570-1587
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.70115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.70115
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.70115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:6:p:1570-1587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.