Author
Listed:
- Chuanjia Du
- Chengjun Wang
- Yangyang Yang
Abstract
Forest ecological benefit compensation mechanisms are critical for aligning private landowner incentives with forest ecosystem service objectives. However, traditional area‐based schemes in China neglect the additionality of the ecosystem services and fail to capture dynamic strategic interactions between policymakers and forest managers. To address this gap, this study develops a two‐player evolutionary game model, in which the government chooses between equalization and compensation incentive compensation, whereas forest farmers decide whether to conserve. The model then analyzes the evolutionary stability of the strategy selection of the game players and explores the impacts of different parameter changes on the evolutionary stable strategy. The results show that the evolutionary stable states of the strategy selection of both parties in the game exhibit complexity due to different initial states. Increases in compensation fees, forest farmers' production revenue, and silvicultural capacity, as well as reductions in forest farmers' risk aversion coefficient, fairness preference coefficient, government free‐riding coefficient, and information asymmetry coefficient, will promote the evolution of the system to the optimal stable equilibrium point. Notably, the forest farmers' conservation effort level under incentive compensation on system evolution presents a significant “inverted U‐shaped” feature. This research provides a new analytical perspective and scientific basis for the optimal design of the forest ecological benefit compensation mechanism.
Suggested Citation
Chuanjia Du & Chengjun Wang & Yangyang Yang, 2026.
"Research on the Evolutionary Stability of Strategy Selection for Forest Ecological Benefit Compensation Standards,"
Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(1), pages 223-243, January.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:223-243
DOI: 10.1002/mde.70036
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:223-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.