IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v47y2026i1p165-182.html

A Study on the Governance Mechanism of Open‐Source Platform Ecosystem From the Perspective of Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Junlin Zhu
  • Lei Ma
  • Wenyan Wei
  • Baoqing Zhu

Abstract

The open‐source platform emerges as a complex and dynamic system, shaped by the intricate interplay and interdependence of a diverse array of stakeholders. Existing studies mostly focus on micro‐level aspects such as individual open‐source entities, projects, or platforms, and rarely rise to the ecosystem level to conduct dynamic evolutionary analysis on the governance mechanisms of highly heterogeneous stakeholders within open‐source platforms. This paper, therefore, constructs an evolutionary game model based on innovation ecosystem theory, with platform governors and complementors as the primary players. By quantifying the strategic choices of both parties under different profit scenarios, the study explores the system's stability characteristics. Additionally, MATLAB simulation analysis is used to examine the impact of parameter changes on the evolution of strategies and paths, elucidating the evolutionary stability of stakeholder strategies within the open‐source platform ecosystem (OSPE). The study finds that: First, incentives for complementors can effectively drive their active contributions, but continuous strong stimuli will instead cause governors to strategically reduce their intervention inputs. Second, the exposure of potential risks from governance inaction has a corrective effect on the behaviors of both parties: It not only forces governors to turn to active performance of duties to safeguard the long‐term value of the OSPE, but also prompts complementors to accelerate behavioral standardization based on direct constraint rules. Third, a high level of open knowledge sharing can create the dual dividends of a systematic reduction in contribution costs and a multiplier effect on the value of the governance ecosystem. This paper unpacks the governance mechanism from the stakeholders' perspective, providing a clearer understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of OSPE and practical insights for formulating its governance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Junlin Zhu & Lei Ma & Wenyan Wei & Baoqing Zhu, 2026. "A Study on the Governance Mechanism of Open‐Source Platform Ecosystem From the Perspective of Stakeholders," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(1), pages 165-182, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:165-182
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.70031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:165-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.