IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i7p3935-3947.html

Key Resource Sharing and Sustainable Innovation in Innovation Consortium: A Multiagent Collaboration and Multihelix Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yijiang Zhou
  • Jiayi Jia
  • Yongzeng Lai
  • Lin Li

Abstract

Faced with the intensification of international competition, the innovation consortium, as an important open innovation paradigm to promote the deep integration of industrial chain and innovation chain, has become a key path for the breakthrough of industrial core technology. However, there are some practical challenges in forming an innovation consortium, such as prominent sharing barriers of key resources and insufficient collaborative efficiency, which make it challenging to meet the needs of sustainable innovation. Based on this, this paper breaks through the traditional linear collaboration analysis framework. It constructs a game model of “leading enterprise‐cooperative organization‐government” to describe the interaction mechanism of multiagent key resource sharing decision‐making in an information asymmetric environment from the perspective of multiagent collaboration and multihelix. Vensim‐PLE simulation software is used to simulate and analyze the influencing factors of multihelix of key resource sharing. The results show that the degree of participation of various agents in sharing key resources is closely related to the sharing ability, cost, benefit, and coordination mechanism. In addition, improving the effectiveness of sharing key resources, enhancing the willingness and scope of sharing, and optimizing resource potential differentials can significantly promote the effect of multihelix of key resources. Therefore, this paper puts forward relevant management suggestions on improving innovation consortium's incentive and constraint mechanism, dynamic selection of partners, and construction of pricing and compensation mechanisms to enhance the innovation consortium's sustainable innovation. To sum up, this study not only expands the research paradigm of open innovation and enriches the connotation dimension of collaborative innovation theory but also provides new ideas for innovation consortiums under competitive environment to solve the dilemma of “resource island” and achieve sustainable collaborative innovation, which has significant practical value for guiding the breakthrough of industrial core technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yijiang Zhou & Jiayi Jia & Yongzeng Lai & Lin Li, 2025. "Key Resource Sharing and Sustainable Innovation in Innovation Consortium: A Multiagent Collaboration and Multihelix Perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 3935-3947, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3935-3947
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4563
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhen Zhang & Min Min, 2022. "Research on the NPD coordination, knowledge transfer process and innovation performance of interfirm projects in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1161-1186, December.
    2. Miao, Senlin & Wen, Fenghua & Zhang, Yun, 2022. "Industry tournament incentives and the speed of leverage adjustments: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Yue Wu & Xin Gu & Zhenzhou Tu & Zhaobohan Zhang, 2022. "System dynamic analysis on industry-university-research institute synergetic innovation process based on knowledge flow," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1317-1338, March.
    4. Lupeng Zhang & Wenbo Chen & Yi Su, 2021. "How Do Innovation Network Structures Affect Knowledge Sharing? A Simulation Analysis of Complex Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-17, January.
    5. Tianru Qin & Lin Liang & Peng Liang & Wenqun Liang, 2025. "Can industrial robot utilization drive the total factor productivity of enterprises?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 129-148, January.
    6. Fenghua Wen & Shan Yang & Daohan Huang, 2023. "Heterogeneous human capital, spatial spillovers and regional innovation: evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Michelle Sovinsky, 2022. "Do Research Joint Ventures Serve a Collusive Function?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 430-475.
    8. Wei‐jian Li & Wei Zhu & Bin Wang, 2023. "The impact of creating shared value strategy on corporate sustainable development: From resources perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2362-2384, September.
    9. Pinghao Ye & Liqiong Liu & Joseph Tan, 2021. "Creative leadership, innovation climate and innovation behaviour: the moderating role of knowledge sharing in management," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(4), pages 1092-1114, March.
    10. Liu, Yulin & Cao, Zhiling & Wen, Fenghua, 2024. "Textual similarity between firm and government: Measurement and pricing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Yue Li & Hang Guo & Sarah Yvonne Cooper & Hongqi Wang, 2019. "The Influencing Factors of the Technology Standard Alliance Collaborative Innovation of Emerging Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cui Zhang & Xiongjin Feng & Yanzhen Wang, 2022. "Technology Spillovers among Innovation Agents from the Perspective of Network Connectedness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Chen, Xian & Liu, Yang & Wen, Fenghua, 2024. "Air pollution and the digital transformation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    3. Brunner, Philipp & Letina, Igor & Schmutzler, Armin, 2024. "Research joint ventures: The role of financial constraints," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Jing, Zhongying & Li, Zheng & Zheng, Ping, 2025. "Population aging and corporate innovation Performance: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Schinkel, Maarten Pieter & Treuren, Leonard, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility by joint agreement," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Wanyi Chen & Hao Ren & Yanyu Shu, 2025. "The Impact of Corporate Digital Transformation on Sustainable Development in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 2721-2747, March.
    7. Qiu, Yi & Gao, Cong & Song, Na, 2025. "Trickle-down or siphon: The spillover effects of the digital economy on green innovation from the perspective of the circular economy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Liu, Fengcai & Zhang, Lianying, 2025. "Effects of project-generic and project-specific knowledge complementarities on value capture: The roles of non-coercive power use and project complexity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Gao, Peng & He, Ling & Hu, Shiyang & Xin, Qingquan, 2024. "Double-edged sword: Does strong creditor protection in the bankruptcy process affect firm productivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    10. Michaela Kesselring & Moritz Kirsch & Frank Wagner & Richard Gloaguen, 2023. "Knowledge and technology transfer in and beyond mineral exploration," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Adacha Felix Kwala & Mary Agoyi, 2024. "The nexus between cyberloafing and employee well-being: role of creativity in the Nigerian service sector," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Sindri Engilbertsson & Sander Onderstal & Leonard Treuren, 2025. "How the design of cartel fines affects prices: Evidence from the lab," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 779661, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    13. Shui-Ying Jin & Hong Chai & Chien-Chiang Lee, 2024. "Knowledge Transfer of China’s HSR Standards “Going Global” Based on System Dynamics," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6111-6150, June.
    14. Yuxin Lin & Yuhua Li, 2025. "Robots and Product Exports: Evidence From Chinese Markets," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(6), pages 3384-3395, September.
    15. Haoding Wang & Haixiao Chen & Ji Tao & Youping Zhu & Lifang Gao, 2026. "Overwhelmed by expectations? Exploring the curvilinear effects of leaders’ creativity expectations?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 207-238, March.
    16. Kimitaka Nishitani & Thi Bich Hue Nguyen & Katsuhiko Kokubu, 2025. "Does the economic motivation of firms to address the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promote the SDGs or merely SDG-washing? Critical empirical evidence from Japan and Vietnam," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 415-465, February.
    17. Han, Feng & Tee, Kienpin & Hao, Siyuan & Xiong, Rancen, 2024. "Does unfairness reduce efficiency? Within-industry CEO pay inequity and firm efficiency in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    18. Liu, Ziyu & Du, Yushen, 2022. "Open knowledge disclosure and technical standard competition in transition economies: A legitimacy perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Deng, Mingmao & Mei, Chun, 2026. "Do industry tournament incentives affect labor investment efficiency?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 709-720.
    20. Wu Guancen & Chen Xuan & Niu Xing, 2025. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Complex Networks in Enterprise Green Technology Innovation From a Prospect Theory Perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1774-1791, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3935-3947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.