Author
Listed:
- Fenling Gu
- Boyuan Tian
- Yixian Ma
Abstract
In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on‐site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A‐share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on‐site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non‐state‐owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on‐site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.
Suggested Citation
Fenling Gu & Boyuan Tian & Yixian Ma, 2025.
"Dual Deterrent Effects of Randomized On‐Site Inspections on Voluntary Information Disclosure: Evidence From Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts,"
Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 3783-3805, October.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3783-3805
DOI: 10.1002/mde.4556
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3783-3805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.