IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i7p3783-3805.html

Dual Deterrent Effects of Randomized On‐Site Inspections on Voluntary Information Disclosure: Evidence From Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Fenling Gu
  • Boyuan Tian
  • Yixian Ma

Abstract

In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on‐site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A‐share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on‐site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non‐state‐owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on‐site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenling Gu & Boyuan Tian & Yixian Ma, 2025. "Dual Deterrent Effects of Randomized On‐Site Inspections on Voluntary Information Disclosure: Evidence From Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 3783-3805, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3783-3805
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4556
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skinner, Dj, 1994. "Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad-News," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 38-60.
    2. Jinyang Liu, 2023. "CSRC’s supervision and corporate investment efficiency—based on the random inspection," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 897-920, October.
    3. Jing He & Marlene A. Plumlee & He Wen, 2019. "Voluntary disclosure, mandatory disclosure and the cost of capital," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3-4), pages 307-335, March.
    4. Trueman, Brett, 1986. "Why do managers voluntarily release earnings forecasts?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 53-71, March.
    5. Beyer, Anne & Cohen, Daniel A. & Lys, Thomas Z. & Walther, Beverly R., 2010. "The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 296-343, December.
    6. Xue Xia & Fei Teng & Liping Xu & Yu Xin, 2024. "CSRC’s random inspection and capital market information efficiency: an empirical evidence from stock price synchronicity," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 199-222, January.
    7. Bruce J. Mcconomy, 1998. "Bias and Accuracy of Management Earnings Forecasts: An Evaluation of the Impact of Auditing," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 167-195, June.
    8. Yinghua Li & Liandong Zhang, 2015. "Short Selling Pressure, Stock Price Behavior, and Management Forecast Precision: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(1), pages 79-117, March.
    9. Alexander Dyck & Natalya Volchkova & Luigi Zingales, 2008. "The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1093-1135, June.
    10. Kong, Dongmin & Liu, Chenhao & Ye, Wenxu, 2023. "Randomized inspection and firm's government subsidies: A natural experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September.
    12. Guoqing Zhang & Sicen Chen & Pengdong Zhang & Xiaowei Lin, 2022. "Does the random inspection reduce audit opinion shopping?," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 528-548, October.
    13. Keitha Dunstan & Gerry Gallery & Thu Phuong Truong, 2011. "Public regulatory reform and management earnings forecasts in a low private litigation environment," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 51(2), pages 437-465, June.
    14. Marilyn F. Johnson & Ron Kasznik & Karen K. Nelson, 2001. "The Impact of Securities Litigation Reform on the Disclosure of Forward‐Looking Information By High Technology Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 297-327, September.
    15. Mark H. Lang & Russell J. Lundholm, 2000. "Voluntary Disclosure and Equity Offerings: Reducing Information Asymmetry or Hyping the Stock?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 623-662, December.
    16. Sarah C. Tasker, 1998. "Bridging the Information Gap: Quarterly Conference Calls as a Medium for Voluntary Disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 137-167, March.
    17. Ke, Konglin & Xu, Wanting & He, Yujie, 2024. "Do regulatory penalties reduce risk-taking of banks?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Thorsten Beck & Ross Levine & Alexey Levkov, 2010. "Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1637-1667, October.
    19. Zhu, Xufeng & Zhang, Chao, 2012. "Reducing information asymmetry in the power industry: Mandatory and voluntary information disclosure regulations of sulfur dioxide emission," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 704-713.
    20. Yang, Xingquan & Zhao, Rui & Yang, Zheng, 2024. "Preventive regulation and corporate financialization: Evidence from China Securities Regulatory Commission's random inspections," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    21. Cox, Clifford T., 1987. "Earnings variability, firm size, and the information content in management forecasts of annual earnings," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 139-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Lina & Wang, Chenxi, 2025. "Randomized inspection and investment-price sensitivity: A natural experiment in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Andy Lardon & Marc Deloof, 2014. "Financial disclosure by SMEs listed on a semi-regulated market: evidence from the Euronext Free Market," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 361-385, February.
    3. Yinju Nie & Ming Jia, 2021. "The power of crowds: can minority shareholder activism promote management earnings forecast accuracy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 6333-6385, December.
    4. Inder K. Khurana & Yinghua Li & Wei Wang, 2018. "The Effects of Hedge Fund Interventions on Strategic Firm Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4094-4117, September.
    5. Christian Leuz & Peter D. Wysocki, 2016. "The Economics of Disclosure and Financial Reporting Regulation: Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 54(2), pages 525-622, May.
    6. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    7. Ting Zhang & So Yean Kwack & Yi Si & Gaoliang Tian, 2023. "Non‐GAAP earnings reporting following going‐concern opinions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3217-3252, September.
    8. Nikolaev, V. & van Lent, L.A.G.M., 2005. "The Endogeneity Bias in the Relation Between Cost-of-Debt Capital and Corporate Disclosure Policy," Other publications TiSEM 5960a342-0adc-4f85-bf87-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Schoenfeld, Jordan, 2017. "The effect of voluntary disclosure on stock liquidity: New evidence from index funds," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 51-74.
    10. Yinghua Li & Liandong Zhang, 2015. "Short Selling Pressure, Stock Price Behavior, and Management Forecast Precision: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(1), pages 79-117, March.
    11. Athanasakou, Vasiliki E. & Strong, Norman C & Walker, Martin, 2014. "The relative concentration of bad versus good news flows," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60139, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Chronopoulos, Panagiotis I. & Siougle, Georgia, 2018. "Examination of the information content of management range forecasts," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 201-210.
    13. Liu, Xiaofeng & Feng, Hua & Tian, Gaoliang & Zhang, Ting, 2024. "Environmental legal institutions and management earnings forecasts: Evidence from the establishment of environmental courts in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 545-573.
    14. Sung, Hao-Chang & Ho, Shirley J., 2023. "Disclosure strategies for management earnings forecasts: The role of managerial compensation structures, overoptimism, and effort," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    15. Heitzman, Shane & Wasley, Charles & Zimmerman, Jerold, 2010. "The joint effects of materiality thresholds and voluntary disclosure incentives on firms' disclosure decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1-2), pages 109-132, February.
    16. Nathan Zhenghang Zhu & Kun Tracy Wang & Mark Wilson, 2022. "The Effect of Conditional Management Earnings Forecast Mandates on Voluntary Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Properties," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(3), pages 479-522, September.
    17. Chase Potter & Zhonghua Zhang, 2026. "Does puffery matter? Evidence from online business acquisitions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 235-267, January.
    18. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Tuo, Ling, 2017. "Voluntary disclosure of non-financial information and its association with sustainability performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 47-59.
    19. Clinton, Sarah B. & White, Joshua T. & Woidtke, Tracie, 2014. "Differences in the information environment prior to seasoned equity offerings under relaxed disclosure regulation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 59-78.
    20. Heinle, Mirko S. & Kim, Chongho & Taylor, Daniel J. & Zhou, Frank S., 2025. "Signaling long-term information using short-term forecasts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3783-3805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.