IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i7p3729-3747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition Policy and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Chen
  • Linghao Yan

Abstract

Competition policy plays an important role in maintaining market competition. However, its effectiveness is not yet well understood, particularly in developing countries. China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) shifts the focus from correcting monopolies after the fact to preventing anti‐competitive policies in advance. This approach effectively lowers administrative monopolies, thus reducing inefficient labor investments. We investigate how competition policy affects firm efficiency in developing countries, where administrative monopolies are widespread. Because labor investment efficiency is highly sensitive to regional administrative monopolies, we use it as our central outcome. Leveraging the FCRS as a quasi‐natural experiment, we show that competition policy significantly improves firms' labor investment efficiency in regions with higher levels of administrative monopoly. Further analysis indicates that competition policy enhances firm efficiency by increasing market competition and reducing firms' environmental uncertainty. The effects are especially strong in state‐owned enterprises. Overall, our findings underscore that managing administrative monopolies is crucial for improving labor investment efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Chen & Linghao Yan, 2025. "Competition Policy and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency: Evidence From China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 3729-3747, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3729-3747
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4553
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3729-3747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.