IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i5p3016-3038.html

Optimal Design and Selection of Software Outsourcing Contracts in the Presence of Bilateral Moral Hazard

Author

Listed:
  • Guofeng Tang
  • Xinxing Liu

Abstract

In the realm of software outsourcing, client participation throughout the software development lifecycle is of paramount importance in determining the success rate of projects. Effective collaboration between clients and software developers is crucial for improving project quality. However, the privacy surrounding their efforts often leads to bilateral moral hazard challenges. To address these complex issues, this study employs the Nash bargaining game theory to construct a theoretical analysis framework for the design and selection of performance‐based contracts and time‐and‐materials contracts. The research finds that comparing the cost‐efficiency parameters and effort elasticity coefficients of both clients and developers can reveal the relative magnitude of their respective effort levels. Furthermore, the reward coefficients in both types of contracts are closely related to the software developer's cost of fixing bugs, the client's sensitivity to bugs, and debugging time. Additionally, the reward coefficient in time‐and‐materials contracts is also influenced by the software developer's effort costs. Through comparative static analysis, the study further discovers that if clients are generally sensitive to software bugs, performance‐based contracts exhibit better incentive effects than time‐and‐materials contracts; if clients are highly sensitive to software bugs, time‐and‐materials contracts are preferable to performance‐based contracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Guofeng Tang & Xinxing Liu, 2025. "Optimal Design and Selection of Software Outsourcing Contracts in the Presence of Bilateral Moral Hazard," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(5), pages 3016-3038, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:5:p:3016-3038
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4499
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tinglong Dai & Kinshuk Jerath, 2019. "Salesforce Contracting Under Uncertain Demand and Supply: Double Moral Hazard and Optimality of Smooth Contracts," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 852-870, September.
    2. He Huang & Minhui Hu & Robert J. Kauffman & Hongyan Xu, 2021. "The Power of Renegotiation and Monitoring in Software Outsourcing: Substitutes or Complements?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1236-1261, December.
    3. Ken Binmore & Ariel Rubinstein & Asher Wolinsky, 1986. "The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(2), pages 176-188, Summer.
    4. Chul Ho Lee & Xianjun Geng & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2013. "Contracting Information Security in the Presence of Double Moral Hazard," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 295-311, June.
    5. Elitzur, Ramy & Gavious, Arieh & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2012. "Information systems outsourcing projects as a double moral hazard problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 379-389.
    6. Chengfan Hou & Mengshi Lu & Tianhu Deng & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2021. "Coordinating Project Outsourcing Through Bilateral Contract Negotiations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1543-1561, November.
    7. Anandasivam Gopal & Konduru Sivaramakrishnan & M. S. Krishnan & Tridas Mukhopadhyay, 2003. "Contracts in Offshore Software Development: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(12), pages 1671-1683, December.
    8. Ghulam Murtaza Khan & Siffat Ullah Khan & Habib Ullah Khan & Muhammad Ilyas, 2022. "Challenges and practices identification in complex outsourcing relationships: A systematic literature review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2006. "Partnership in a Dynamic Production System with Unobservable Actions and Noncontractible Output," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1509-1527, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar & Bala Shetty, 2016. "Managing Co-Creation in Information Technology Projects: A Differential Games Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 517-537.
    2. Kai-Lung Hui & Ping Fan Ke & Yuxi Yao & Wei T. Yue, 2019. "Bilateral Liability-Based Contracts in Information Security Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 411-429, June.
    3. Emanuele Bacchiega & Olivier Bonroy & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2018. "Contract contingency in vertically related markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 772-791, October.
    4. Hang Jiang, 2025. "An Implementation Relaxation Approach to Principal-Agent Problems," Papers 2509.14766, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    5. Shantanu Bhattacharya & Alok Gupta & Sameer Hasija, 2014. "Joint Product Improvement by Client and Customer Support Center: The Role of Gain-Share Contracts in Coordination," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 137-151, March.
    6. Guillaume Roels & Uday S. Karmarkar & Scott Carr, 2010. "Contracting for Collaborative Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 849-863, May.
    7. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    8. MARINI, Marco, 1996. "Property Rights and Market : Employee Privatization as a Cooperative Bargaining Process," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1996023, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2005. "Alliances and negotiations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 128-141, March.
    10. Jahn, Eric & Prüfer, Jens, 2008. "Interconnection and competition among asymmetric networks in the Internet backbone market," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 243-256, September.
    11. Steinar Holden, 1998. "Wage Drift and the Relevance of Centralised Wage Setting," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(4), pages 711-731, December.
    12. Carlsson, Mikael & Westermark, Andreas, 2011. "The New Keynesian Phillips Curve and staggered price and wage determination in a model with firm-specific labor," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 579-603, April.
    13. Dávila, J. & Eeckhout, J., 2008. "Competitive bargaining equilibrium," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 269-294, March.
    14. Izat B. Baybusinov & Enrico Maria Fenoaltea & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2022. "Negotiation problem," Papers 2201.12619, arXiv.org.
    15. Sniekers, F.J.T., 2013. "Endogenous Beveridge cycles and the volatility of unemployment," CeNDEF Working Papers 13-12, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance.
    16. Ester Faia & Wolfgang Lechthaler & Christian Merkl, 2014. "Labor Selection, Turnover Costs, and Optimal Monetary Policy," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 115-144, February.
    17. Theilen Bernd, 2009. "Market Competition and Lower Tier Incentives," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-29, June.
    18. Beccuti, Juan & Möller, Marc, 2021. "Screening by mode of trade," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 400-420.
    19. Hughes, Elliott & Watt, Richard, 2025. "Bargaining theory and the copyright royalty board’s rate setting decisions for interactive streaming of music," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 58-65.
    20. Radzvilas, Mantas, 2016. "Hypothetical Bargaining and the Equilibrium Selection Problem in Non-Cooperative Games," MPRA Paper 70248, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:5:p:3016-3038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.