IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v40y2019i7p772-786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The temporary shutdown decision: Lessons from the Great Recession

Author

Listed:
  • James R. Brown
  • Robert E. Carpenter
  • Bruce C. Petersen

Abstract

The temporary shutdown condition provides guidance on dealing with a serious transitory downturn in demand. The traditional condition says managers should stop production when revenues fall below avoidable costs. This condition is flawed because it ignores how lost human capital and reputational damage harm future profits. As a consequence, firms may optimally operate with losses far larger than stipulated by the traditional condition. We provide the first broad empirical analysis of the temporary shutdown decision, focusing on the Great Recession. We show that large operating losses were common and temporary shutdowns were exceedingly rare, even among very small public firms.

Suggested Citation

  • James R. Brown & Robert E. Carpenter & Bruce C. Petersen, 2019. "The temporary shutdown decision: Lessons from the Great Recession," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(7), pages 772-786, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:40:y:2019:i:7:p:772-786
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eirik Sjåholm Knudsen & Lasse B. Lien & Bram Timmermans & Robert Wuebker, 2022. "The more things change, the more they stay the same: Demand‐side responses to economic shocks," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1240-1255, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:40:y:2019:i:7:p:772-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.