IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v45y2026i2ne70089.html

How Effective Are Building Codes at Reducing Residential Water Use? Evidence From California Billing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Nemati

Abstract

This study examines the impact of residential water‐efficiency standards on household water consumption, utilizing billing data from California. I examine both the short‐ and long‐term impacts of the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), comparing homes constructed just before and after its implementation in 2010. The findings show that, on average, CALGreen homes use 11.7% less water than comparable pre‐code homes, with savings persisting over time at approximately 10.9%. Notably, engineering‐based (ex ante) estimates of water savings are nearly twice as large as the realized reductions, likely reflecting the “offsetting behavior” effect. The analysis further reveals that most water savings occur during warmer months when outdoor water use peaks. In addition, CALGreen homes exhibit lower sensitivity to temperature fluctuations, with smaller increases in use during hotter months and smaller reductions during cooler months. Finally, when accounting for compliance costs and the opportunity cost of water, the results suggest that CALGreen policy passes a cost‐effectiveness test. These findings highlight the effectiveness of building codes as a durable policy tool for achieving long‐term water conservation in fast‐growing, semi‐arid regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Nemati, 2026. "How Effective Are Building Codes at Reducing Residential Water Use? Evidence From California Billing Data," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:45:y:2026:i:2:n:e70089
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.70089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.70089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.70089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:45:y:2026:i:2:n:e70089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.