IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v45y2026i2ne70089.html

How Effective Are Building Codes at Reducing Residential Water Use? Evidence From California Billing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Nemati

Abstract

This study examines the impact of residential water‐efficiency standards on household water consumption, utilizing billing data from California. I examine both the short‐ and long‐term impacts of the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), comparing homes constructed just before and after its implementation in 2010. The findings show that, on average, CALGreen homes use 11.7% less water than comparable pre‐code homes, with savings persisting over time at approximately 10.9%. Notably, engineering‐based (ex ante) estimates of water savings are nearly twice as large as the realized reductions, likely reflecting the “offsetting behavior” effect. The analysis further reveals that most water savings occur during warmer months when outdoor water use peaks. In addition, CALGreen homes exhibit lower sensitivity to temperature fluctuations, with smaller increases in use during hotter months and smaller reductions during cooler months. Finally, when accounting for compliance costs and the opportunity cost of water, the results suggest that CALGreen policy passes a cost‐effectiveness test. These findings highlight the effectiveness of building codes as a durable policy tool for achieving long‐term water conservation in fast‐growing, semi‐arid regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Nemati, 2026. "How Effective Are Building Codes at Reducing Residential Water Use? Evidence From California Billing Data," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:45:y:2026:i:2:n:e70089
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.70089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.70089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.70089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark T. Kanazawa, 1994. "Water Subsidies, Water Transfers, And Economic Efficiency," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 12(2), pages 112-122, April.
    2. Alexander Maas & Roshan Puri & Christopher Goemans, 2024. "A review of residential water conservation policies and attempts to measure their effectiveness," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Haghverdi, Amir & Singh, Amninder & Sapkota, Anish & Reiter, Maggie & Ghodsi, Somayeh, 2021. "Developing irrigation water conservation strategies for hybrid bermudagrass using an evapotranspiration-based smart irrigation controller in inland southern California," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Kevin Novan & Aaron Smith & Tianxia Zhou, 2022. "Residential Building Codes Do Save Energy: Evidence from Hourly Smart-Meter Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(3), pages 483-500, May.
    5. Meredith Fowlie & Michael Greenstone & Catherine Wolfram, 2018. "Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(3), pages 1597-1644.
    6. Grant D. Jacobsen & Matthew J. Kotchen, 2013. "Are Building Codes Effective at Saving Energy? Evidence from Residential Billing Data in Florida," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(1), pages 34-49, March.
    7. Chris Bruegge & Tatyana Deryugina & Erica Myers, 2019. "The Distributional Effects of Building Energy Codes," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(S1), pages 95-127.
    8. Nemati, Mehdi & Buck, Steven & Soldati, Hilary, 2025. "High-frequency analytics and residential water consumption: Estimating heterogeneous effects," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Yating Chuang & Magali A. Delmas & Stephanie Pincetl, 2022. "Are Residential Energy Efficiency Upgrades Effective? An Empirical Analysis in Southern California," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(4), pages 641-679.
    10. Lori S. Bennear & Jonathan M. Lee & Laura O. Taylor, 2013. "Municipal Rebate Programs for Environmental Retrofits: An Evaluation of Additionality and Cost‐Effectiveness," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 350-372, March.
    11. Matthew J. Kotchen, 2017. "Longer-Run Evidence on Whether Building Energy Codes Reduce Residential Energy Consumption," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 135-153.
    12. Davis, S.L. & Dukes, M.D. & Miller, G.L., 2009. "Landscape irrigation by evapotranspiration-based irrigation controllers under dry conditions in Southwest Florida," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1828-1836, December.
    13. Chong, Howard, 2012. "Building vintage and electricity use: Old homes use less electricity in hot weather," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 906-930.
    14. Arik Levinson, 2016. "How Much Energy Do Building Energy Codes Save? Evidence from California Houses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(10), pages 2867-2894, October.
    15. Khachatryan, Hayk & Suh, Dong Hee & Xu, Wan & Useche, Pilar & Dukes, Michael D., 2019. "Towards sustainable water management: Preferences and willingness to pay for smart landscape irrigation technologies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 33-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadush Meles, Tensay & Farrell, Niall & Curtis, John, 2023. "Are energy performance certificates a strong predictor of actual energy use? Evidence from high-frequency thermostat panel data," Papers WP749, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    2. Stefano Carattini & Wade Davis & Béla Figge & Anton Heimerdinger, 2025. "Solar Adoption by Mandates," CESifo Working Paper Series 12359, CESifo.
    3. Aydin, Erdal, 2024. "Heterogeneous impacts of building codes on residential energy demand," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Matthew J. Holian, 2023. "Methods in open policy analysis: An application to California's building energy codes," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(4), pages 613-628, October.
    5. Jacobsen, Grant D., 2025. "Who adopts and deploys advanced home energy technologies?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Singhal, Puja & Pahle, Michael & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Levesque, Antoine & Sommer, Stephan & Berneiser, Jessica, 2022. "Beyond good faith: Why evidence-based policy is necessary to decarbonize buildings cost-effectively in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Ekaterina Alekhanova & Maya Papineau & Kareman Yassin, 2023. "Realized Savings from Canada's Building Energy Codes," Carleton Economic Papers 23-06, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    8. Lucas W. Davis & Sebastian Martinez & Bibiana Taboada, 2018. "How Effective is Energy-Efficient Housing? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Mexico," NBER Working Papers 24581, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Lang, Ghislaine & Lanz, Bruno, 2022. "Climate policy without a price signal: Evidence on the implicit carbon price of energy efficiency in buildings," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    10. Germeshausen, Robert & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Achtnicht, Martin, 2022. "Does the stick make the carrot more attractive? State mandates and uptake of renewable heating technologies," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Davis, Lucas W. & Martinez, Sebastian & Taboada, Bibiana, 2020. "How effective is energy-efficient housing? Evidence from a field trial in Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Est vez, Andr s & Tovar Rea os , Miguel, 2024. "Empowering homes? Unravelling the connection between energy efficiency and well-being," Papers WP784, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    13. Myers, Erica, 2020. "Asymmetric information in residential rental markets: Implications for the energy efficiency gap," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Carattini, Stefano & Figge, Béla & Gordan, Alexander & Löschel, Andreas, 2024. "Municipal building codes and the adoption of solar photovoltaics," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. J. Wesley Burnett & Jessica Madariaga, 2018. "A Top-Down Economic Efficiency Analysis of U.S. HouseholdEnergy Consumption," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(4), pages 1-30, July.
    16. Omar Isaac Asensio & Olga Churkina & Becky D. Rafter & Kira E. O’Hare, 2024. "Housing policies and energy efficiency spillovers in low and moderate income communities," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 590-601, May.
    17. Singhal, Puja & Hobbs, Andrew, 2021. "The Distribution of Energy Efficiency and Regional Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242343, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    18. Arik Levinson, 2016. "How Much Energy Do Building Energy Codes Save? Evidence from California Houses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(10), pages 2867-2894, October.
    19. Matthew J. Kotchen, 2015. "Do Building Energy Codes Have a Lasting Effect on Energy Consumption? New Evidence From Residential Billing Data in Florida," NBER Working Papers 21398, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Papineau, Maya & Rivers, Nicholas & Yassin, Kareman, 2025. "Household benefits from energy efficiency retrofits: Implications for net zero housing policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:45:y:2026:i:2:n:e70089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.