IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v44y2025i3p997-1059.html

How effective are behavioral interventions to increase the take‐up of social benefits? A systematic review of field experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre‐Marc Daigneault
  • Mathieu Ouimet
  • Alexandre Fortier‐Chouinard
  • Eriole Zita Nonki Tadida
  • Antoine Baby‐Bouchard

Abstract

Non‐take‐up of social benefits is a significant policy issue caused by factors such as lack of awareness, compliance costs, and stigma. While public information campaigns, default options, and in‐person assistance are increasingly used, their effectiveness remains poorly understood. This study provides a systematic review of field experiments evaluating nudges and simple behavioral interventions on program take‐up. We analyzed 93 interventions from 35 studies published over nearly 20 years, predominantly focusing on major U.S. programs. We compared study characteristics, including sample and intervention types, and assessed study quality. Due to high heterogeneity, we did not conduct a meta‐analysis but used forest plots and thematic summaries instead. Most studies reported a positive impact on program take‐up, but not on program application. Two types of interventions were notable for their impact on program application and take‐up: 1) providing and framing information; and 2) providing assistance. We discuss the limitations of this review, including the cost and safety of nudges and the implications of focusing on field experiments. We conclude that further research is needed on simpler interventions outside the U.S., as well as on compliance and psychological costs. Additionally, improving the quality and transparency of field experiments is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre‐Marc Daigneault & Mathieu Ouimet & Alexandre Fortier‐Chouinard & Eriole Zita Nonki Tadida & Antoine Baby‐Bouchard, 2025. "How effective are behavioral interventions to increase the take‐up of social benefits? A systematic review of field experiments," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 997-1059, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:997-1059
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.70005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avery, Christopher & Castleman, Benjamin L. & Hurwitz, Michael & Long, Bridget Terry & Page, Lindsay C., 2021. "Digital messaging to improve college enrollment and success," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Bird, Kelli A. & Castleman, Benjamin L. & Denning, Jeffrey T. & Goodman, Joshua & Lamberton, Cait & Rosinger, Kelly Ochs, 2021. "Nudging at scale: Experimental evidence from FAFSA completion campaigns," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 105-128.
    3. Elizabeth Linos & Lisa T. Quan & Elspeth Kirkman, 2020. "Nudging Early Reduces Administrative Burden: Three Field Experiments to Improve Code Enforcement," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 243-265, January.
    4. Holger Mueller & Constantine Yannelis, 2022. "Increasing Enrollment in Income‐Driven Student Loan Repayment Plans: Evidence from the Navient Field Experiment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(1), pages 367-402, February.
    5. Charlotte Van Dijck & Trui Steen, 2023. "Collaborating for Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Red Tape Effects at Play," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 994-1005, October.
    6. Mario Ianniello & Silvia Iacuzzi & Paolo Fedele & Luca Brusati, 2019. "Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: a systematic review," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 21-46, January.
    7. Bertrand, Marianne & Shafir, Eldar & Mullainathan, Sendhil, 2006. "Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making Among the Poor," Scholarly Articles 2962609, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    8. Jennifer Stuber & Karl Kronebusch, 2004. "Stigma and other determinants of participation in TANF and Medicaid," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 509-530.
    9. Elizabeth Linos & Allen Prohofsky & Aparna Ramesh & Jesse Rothstein & Matthew Unrath, 2022. "Can Nudges Increase Take-Up of the EITC? Evidence from Multiple Field Experiments," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 432-452, November.
    10. Damon Jones, 2010. "Information, Preferences, and Public Benefit Participation: Experimental Evidence from the Advance EITC and 401(k) Savings," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 147-163, April.
    11. Richard Domurat & Isaac Menashe & Wesley Yin, 2021. "The Role of Behavioral Frictions in Health Insurance Marketplace Enrollment and Risk: Evidence from a Field Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1549-1574, May.
    12. Moore, Ryan T. & Gan, Katherine N. & Minnich, Karissa & Yokum, David, 2022. "Anchor management: a field experiment to encourage families to meet critical programme deadlines," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 615-636, December.
    13. Diana C. Mutz & Robin Pemantle & Philip Pham, 2019. "The Perils of Balance Testing in Experimental Design: Messy Analyses of Clean Data," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 32-42, January.
    14. Goldin, Jacob & Homonoff, Tatiana & Javaid, Rizwan & Schafer, Brenda, 2022. "Tax filing and take-up: Experimental evidence on tax preparation outreach and benefit claiming," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0157805 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Blanco Mariana & Vargas Juan F., 2014. "Can SMS Technology Improve Low Take-up of Social Benefits?," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 61-81, January.
    17. Carolyn J. Heinrich & Sayil Camacho & Sarah Clark Henderson & Mónica Hernández & Ela Joshi, 2022. "Consequences of Administrative Burden for Social Safety Nets that Support the Healthy Development of Children," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 11-44, January.
    18. repec:osf:osfxxx:26xdj_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Fels, Katja Marie, 2025. "Who nudges whom? Expert opinions on behavioural field experiments with public partners," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 212-248, January.
    20. Sylvain Chareyron & David Gray & Yannick L’Horty, 2018. "Raising Take-Up of Social Assistance Benefits through a Simple Mailing: Evidence from a French Field Experiment," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 128(5), pages 777-805.
    21. Hom, J.K. & Stillson, C. & Grande, D. & Rosin, R. & Cahill, R. & Kruger, E., 2017. "Effect of outreach messages on Medicaid Enrollment," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107, pages 71-73.
    22. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303845_3 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Peter Hupe & Aurélien Buffat, 2014. "A Public Service Gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 548-569, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Migchelbrink, Koen & Raymaekers, Pieter, 2023. "Nudging people to pay their parking fines on time. Evidence from a cluster-randomized field experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Owen, Stephanie, 2023. "College major choice and beliefs about relative performance: An experimental intervention to understand gender gaps in STEM," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Mariona Tres Vilanova, 2024. "Why Do Eligible Individuals Fail to Enrol in Government Social Benefits? A Systematic Scoping Review of Barriers to Access," Working Papers 265, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    4. Urbina, Maria José & Moya, Andres & Rozo, Sandra V., 2023. "The Fine Line between Nudging and Nagging: Increasing Take-up Rates through Social Media Platforms," IZA Discussion Papers 16521, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Rinehart, Chloe S. & McGuire, James W., 2017. "Obstacles to Takeup: Ecuador's Conditional Cash Transfer Program, The Bono de Desarrollo Humano," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 165-177.
    6. Araya, Roberto & Cristia, Julian & Escalante, Lisseth & Fabregas, Raissa & Méndez, Carolina & Ríos, Gera, 2025. "Messaging teachers to boost student EdTech use," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Benjamin L. Castleman & Francis X. Murphy & Richard W. Patterson & William L. Skimmyhorn, 2021. "Nudges Don't Work When the Benefits Are Ambiguous: Evidence from a High‐Stakes Education Program," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 1230-1248, September.
    8. Menghan Shen & Zhiwei Tang & Xiaoxia Liang & Xiaoyang Ye, 2025. "Migrant children's take‐up of social health insurance: Experimental evidence from China," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 456-482, March.
    9. Hojman, Daniel A. & Miranda, Álvaro, 2018. "Agency, Human Dignity, and Subjective Well-being," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Eric P. Bettinger & Benjamin L. Castleman & Alice Choe & Zachary Mabel, 2022. "Finishing the Last Lap: Experimental Evidence on Strategies to Increase Attainment for Students Near College Completion," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 1040-1059, September.
    11. Sylvain Chareyron & David Gray & Yannick L’Horty, 2018. "Raising Take-Up of Social Assistance Benefits through a Simple Mailing: Evidence from a French Field Experiment," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 128(5), pages 777-805.
    12. Christa Deneault, 2023. "College Enrollment and Mandatory FAFSA Applications: Evidence from Louisiana," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 465-494, August.
    13. Vivian Yuen Ting Liu & Alexandra Haralampoudis & Isabel Polon, 2024. "Combating Summer Melt: The Impact of Near-Peer Mentor Matriculation Program in New York City," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(5), pages 794-826, August.
    14. Jeehoon Han, 2020. "Snap Expansions And Participation In Government Safety Net Programs," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(4), pages 1929-1948, October.
    15. Alina Martinez & Tamara Linkow & Hannah Miller & Amanda Parsad & Cristofer Price, "undated". "Study of College Transition Messaging in GEAR UP: Impacts on Enrolling and Staying in College," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c6113480c8134325ac685ddd9, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Fan, Ying & Fu, Yuqi & Yang, Zan & Chen, Ming, 2023. "Search Frictions in Rental Markets: Evidence from Urban China," Working Paper Series 23/11, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    17. Iselin, John & Mackay, Taylor & Unrath, Matthew, 2023. "Measuring take-up of the California EITC with state administrative data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    18. Simonse, Olaf & Van Dijk, Wilco W. & Van Dillen, Lotte F. & Van Dijk, Eric, 2024. "Economic predictors of the subjective experience of financial stress," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    19. Julie Janssens & Natascha Van Mechelen, 2017. "Who is to Blame? An Overview of the Factors Contributing to the Non-Take-Up of Social Rights," Working Papers 1708, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    20. Kim, Sie Won, 2025. "Early impacts of the FAFSA requirement in Texas," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:997-1059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.